Richard D Hall is a solo maverick in the truth movement. He
is fiercely independent and the only events he ever organizes are his own. I've
been to his live shows before, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/richplanet-live-in-london.html.
(See links column for Richard's website). I'd heard
some reports from others who'd attended his shows in the previous few days, but
I knew that his format could change at the last minute. His work is based
around current affairs so you never know what you're going to get untill you're
literally sitting in front of him. The 2015 Richplanet Tour is subtitled
"as NOT seen on TV" which is appropriate because Richard has had no
end of trouble from the television network related to his programme; they
forbid him from broadcasting all his best material and a few months ago they
banned him because of his episode with Nick Kollerstrom about the Woolwich
incident, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/chris-spivey-arrest-whos-next.html.
Showcase TV are not as "controversial" as they profess. It costs
Richard £600 to buy the airtime and he wonders "Is it worth it?" The
good news is that all his shows are available, completely uncensored, on his
website viewer, see link above. Ustane and I were familiar with the venue, as
we trudged up towards it we recalled the 2013 AMMACH conference which was held
there, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/ammach-conference-2013.html.
Also some years earlier we had seen the late Lloyd Pye give a lecture there.
The Belgrave Rooms are the city's Masonic centre and are covered with the
Brotherhood's occult symbolism, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/ammach-conference-2013-vox-pop.html.
However they have the cheapest function suite to hire in Nottingham ,
which makes it quite understandable that Richard and other would choose to book
it. I was keen to pick up Richard's latest DVD releases from his stall; two
full-length films. I was delighted to meet up with lots of my old friends; some
I knew would be there, with others it was a nice surprise. Some of them had
never met Ustane and it was nice to introduce them to her; the social side of
these events is equally important as the lecture content itself.
Richard D Hall bounded onto the stage in his trademark dark brown suit to thunderous applause from the audience, some of whom were standing at
the sides beside the packed seats. The first part of his talk was entitled: Subversion in the UK, although strictly
speaking a large part of this subversion relates to an incident that did not
happen in the UK ,
but in Portugal .
It was the subject of one of Richard's new films, the second part of his expose
of the Madeleine McCann case, called Buried
by Mainstream Media, the True Story of Madeleine McCann- The Phantoms. The
film opens with the same music that the first one does. I can't recall who
Richard gets to compose his theme tunes, he did tell me once, but they're
excellent at their job. Ustane and I find the score very poignant and we've
started calling it "Madeleine's Requiem". Madeleine McCann was three
years old in May 2007, the time she allegedly disappeared from a holiday villa
at an Algarve
resort in Portugal .
According to her parents they left her sleeping in a bedroom with her brother
and sister while they went to a restaurant for a meal just a short walk away. They
nipped back to the villa regularly to check on the children and on one of these
checks they found that somebody had broken in and abducted Madeleine. There was
a huge international media storm and campaigns to "find Maddy now!"
which raised millions of pounds. This second part of Richard's investigation
provides lots of new information and maybe even some answers. The only evidence
of any abduction of Madeleine comes from a few eyewitness accounts which are
very dubious in themselves. One of the McCann's friends, Jane Tanner, says that
she saw a man carrying a young child in his arms, yet the forensic artist's
depictions of the man, whom Richard calls "Tannerman", are very
vague; they even look a bit like Richard D Hall himself! What's more Ms Tanner
never mentioned him at the time. Strange how one would fail to tell the police
about a man seen carrying a child away from the apartment after knowing there's
been an abduction of a child there. Three other suspects were seen in the area.
In one case a man reported to the police that one of them had attempted to
abduct his daughter, yet for some reason he only came forward after Madeleine's
"abduction" had been publicized. The footprints of conspiracy lead on
to where the body of Brenda Leyland was found in a hotel near Leicester ,
see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/mccanns-twitter-troll-found-dead.html.
Richard managed to track down a former employee of the McCanns who says that
nothing in Jane Tanner's story makes sense. It makes even less sense when Ms
Tanner added more and more details to Tannerman's description, some of them, at
least, clearly imaginary. The second supposed suspect Richard christened
"Sagresman" because he was said to have been seen on the beach near
the village of Sagres on Cape St Vincent, about sixteen miles from Praia da Luz
where the McCanns and their friends were staying. It's chilly and windy there
in April and few people would have been on the beach, yet a father claims that
a man tried to kidnap his daughter there in late April, the 27th or 29th
(which!?). Yet for some reason this man didn't report it to the police until after Madeleine's disappearance; he also
sent the authorities on a wild goose chase across Europe to question a polish
holidaymaker and his wife. The father gave his name as Nuno Lourenco and
Richard suspects his story is a fantasy invented to support the idea that there
was a dangerous paedophile at large in the area who was intent on abducting a
young girl; this would make him an accomplice of the McCanns and their friends.
Another phantom suspect, "Smithman", crops up from a report in Ireland
by the Smith family from Drogehda. They claim to have seen a man walking down
to the beach just after Madeleine's disappearance; he was carrying a young girl
in his arms and he closely resembled Tannerman. However similar criticisms can
be made of their statements that were made of Jane Tanner's. The Smiths didn't
report their sighting for thirteen days, even though Madeleine's disappearance
had been on the headlines across the world since then. The confusion and
incompetence the Portuguese investigation suffered seems to have been the product
of a spanner in the works thrown by the English translator Robert Murat; was he
a mole working as part of the conspiracy too? He was eventually set up as
another suspect, one more red herring to thwart police progress. Despite the
disintegration of the Smithman farce, the story was promoted by Scotland Yard
and even thrown together into a superficially plausible "new lead"
that was included in a special report on Crimewatch
UK. The McCann team also propped up Smithman in their personal
publications, and it's covered by Kate McCann, Madeleine's mother, in her book.
The plot is thickened even more when, unbelievably, a fourth phantom is
revealed; he came forward to the police after over three years had passed and
claims to be Tannerman. He was a local father carrying his daughter home from a
creche. The Scotland Yard Crimewatch
photographs of "Crecheman" blur his face so he's not been revealed in
his full identity. Luckily Wendy Murphy, a legal expert on crimes against
children, has spoken publicly about her doubt. Another is the famous TV crime
reporter Shaw Taylor (sadly he's just died). I thought this odd at the time;
why was Madeleine McCann's case getting so much publicity when, sadly, children
disappearing like this is not unusual; in fact similar events happen literally
every day. Richard thinks Madeleine died in the apartment and her parents and
their friends disposed of the body, and they are covering up her death. The
evidence comes from searches of the scene by sniffer dogs which picked up the
smell of blood and dead bodies there. Also the McCanns' stories are full of
contradictions and very imprecise information. The McCanns' "charity"
is connected to some extremely untrustworthy people including high diplomatic
officials, media spin doctors from Tony Blair's government, fifth column
psychological mind-controllers and also supposed private investigators with
links to fraud, espionage and organized crime. Even the Pope offered his moral
support. The question is, did the parents murder Madeleine or did she die of
natural causes? If it's the latter then why didn't they just say so? They were
on holiday with a group of about seven friends, with children of their own,
"the Tapas Seven" as they've been christened, and it looks as though
they're involved too. Did one of the friends kill Madeleine? If so why are the
parents collaborating with them? If the parents are the culprits then why are
these friends collaborating with the McCanns? The entire group of people
surrounding the McCanns even tried to frame somebody for kidnapping Madeleine;
it's totally "Bob Lazar" as Richard himself would say. Why has
Madeleine McCann's supposed kidnapping been made such a cause celebre involving such high profile people, front-page
headlines and official institutions? There are no certain answers yet. Richard
speculates that it might have something to do with organized child abuse and
MI5 involvement in it, like at Kincora Boys Home. Possibly, we know MI5 were
involved in that, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/mi5-cover-up-kincora.html.
The DVD of this film can be purchased here: http://www.richplanet.net/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=256.
Richard D Hall's second new production is called An Independent Investigation into the
Cumbria Shootings- Patsy Driver; it is a new viewpoint on one of the worst
firearms offences in British history. The official story goes that Derrick
Bird, a mild-mannered taxi driver from Rowrah, Cumbria who had been behaving
perfectly normally up to that point, suddenly got up one morning in June 2010
and went on a killing spree; he shot dead twelve people and injured eleven
others before driving to an isolated rural lane and turning his gun on himself.
However, as is often the case, the truth behind the news is more complicated,
and it's deliberately hidden by the authorities. It does seem as if Derrick
Bird did carry out some of the attacks, but the evidence for the party line,
that he was the only killer, simply isn't there. Like Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan
Sirhan and Mark Chapman, he is a "patsy", somebody manipulated into
taking the blame for the secret crimes of others. In fact I think the Derrick
Bird incident has remarkable similarities to the Port
Arthur shooting in which a young man called Martin
Bryant supposedly gunned down people at a tourist cafe in Australia ;
but the evidence doesn't match, see: http://www.whale.to/b/viallspam.html.
In the case of Chapman, who allegedly shot John Lennon, and Sirhan, who is
supposed to have killed Robert Kennedy, the patsies were in a trance state and
probably under mind control, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/bobby-kennedy-two-gunmen.html.
The same possibility emerges in the Derrick Bird case, although Channel 4's
documentary on the subject was a typical pathetic primetime whitewash. As far
as the witnesses to the shootings go, not all of them saw the gunman and of
those only a few got a good look at his face. The witness who got the best look
at him describes him as somebody who is totally different to Bird in appearance.
As with 9/11 and 7/7, the CCTV evidence which has been released to the public,
is scant, ambiguous and, so it seems, specifically selected to conceal and mislead.
Richard's research is thorough and systematic; he retraces the route supposedly
taken by Bird that day and interviews some of the witnesses himself. The region
is a close-knit community and many of the residents knew Bird personally; they
all say that he was not somebody they would ever suspect of being a mass
murderer. There are also discrepancies in their testimonies. The gunman... or
gunmen's taxies were Citroen
Picassoes, but in some cases it's reported as greyish blue, on other cases
maroon. In Whitehaven the killer shot out his left quarterlight, yet in other
places the witnesses say that all the car's glass was intact. Some of the CCTV shows
a vehicle with a taxi sign on the roof, in others this is absent. Some of the
people involved with the victims are very reluctant to speak to the media, and
one of them called the police when Richard approached them. The people who live
in the inland areas in the later part of Bird's supposed rampage are the most
cagey of all and Richard says: "It's like drawing teeth to get them to
make a statement after Seascale!". I had a similar reception in Nottingham
when making inquiries about Helen Duncan, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/helen-duncan-most-dangerous-psychic-in.html.
Neil Sanders is featured in the film in a few scenes describing how
"Manchurian candidates" can be programmed using the methods developed
many years ago during the CIA's MK Ultra project (see here for more information
on Neil's work: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/programme-20-podcast-neil-sanders.html).
Was Derrick Bird one of these hypnotized assassins? Were other operatives
driving different cars used to carry out some of the other killings? Was bird
murdered? He might have been shot by somebody else, like Oswald was by Jack
Ruby, or programmed to shoot himself. Either way the end result was that there
were no suspects to try for murder and the legalities of the case were dealt
with by a coroner's inquest. These are much easier to rig than criminal trials.
If the official story is true and Derrick Bird was the proverbial "lone
nut" then why would he do it? The papers have tabled a whole array of
motives, that he was angry over financial issues, even though he had £22,000 in
the bank. He also supposedly had woman trouble and issues at work. Also apparently
the taxman was after him, even though he was not eligible to pay tax. His first
alleged victim was his own twin brother, although there's little evidence to
link Bird with the killing; the same goes for his solicitor Kevin
Commons Kevin Commons
Richard has been approached several times by mainstream
media and in the London lecture
last year (see link above) he explains how he was asked by Plum Pictures to
take part in The Great UFO Conspiracy
while they were in preproduction. He wisely told them where to go, as did I; the
end result has completely vindicated us, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/letters-of-complaint.html.
However the word has not got round yet because a lady called Jenny Kleeman
asked him to take part in a "documentary" she is making about
alternative views on the fate of Madeleine McCann... you can guess what Richard
said. Then lo and behold, she turns up at the event! Actually she just hung
around outside hoping to get a vox populi
on Richard's talk (if you ask me I think she fancies him!). Richard talked more
about the media, highlighting something I've noticed myself, but not given much
thought to. Because newspaper sales are dropping, newspaper stands are found in
places they would not have been a few years ago, like supermarkets and
department stores. Also more free papers are coming out, most notably Metro, a paper that people can just pick
up and read from free racks on busses and trains etc; it makes all its income
from its ad pages. Another trick the media use is to create false role-models
and Richard asked his viewers to vote on who they thought was the biggest of
these. I voted for Russell Brand; I said: "Russell
Brand, a man who is being very highly promoted in the mainstream for his
supposed anti-establishment views. Brand
used to be a friend of David Icke and knows about the idea that 9/11 was an inside
job, but will not say so publicly. David told him: 'Walk the talk or walk
away!' and they haven't spoken since. Brand is being led along by his giant ego
and his puppet masters feed it to make him do whatever they want him to." Brand
is bringing out a film very soon about bankers, but will it be anything other
than controlled opposition? Doubt it, but we'll find out; I'll review it. However,
Brand was beaten into second place by the man anybody who knows me will have thought I was going to vote for, that
smiling Simeon of the small screen, Prof. Brian Cox. I've written about Cox an
awful lot, maybe too much, but I stand by what I've been saying; His Royal
Coxness is playing a very important and unique role in media mind control and
disinformation, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/prof-brian-cox-watch-this-space.html.
Other nominated media reaction agents include Stephen Fry; he presents a comedy
quiz show called QI and it has a very
Skeptic-based theme. He recently appeared on Irish TV presenting some rather
theologically weak arguments for atheism; and his co-host on QI is none other than Dan Schreiber,
presenter of The Great UFO Travesty, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-great-ufo-conspiracy-review.html.
Jeremy Clarkson was also nominated by a few of the voters. Clarkson has been in
trouble many times at the BBC, for instance he once described a very dark place
as: "dark as Lenny Henry in a cave!" Lenny Henry being a well-known
black comedian. That metaphor is completely benign as far as I can see yet
there was uproar; black celebrities came on TV to say how disgusted they were
and "race relations" groups lambasted him. Clarkson doesn't care and
I respect him for that. Interestingly it's in the news at the moment that
Clarkson has been sacked from his job at the BBC; therefore somebody with the
initials "JC" is being crucified at Easter... you have to credit the
Loomies for their sense of humour! I got into a heated argument with somebody
over Clarkson because this person I know thinks that anybody who so much as
mentions Clarkson has fallen for a simple distraction psy-op; I disagree. I
think there is an agenda over Clarkson; but it's not distraction, it's cultural
Marxism. Jeremy Clarkson has failed to abide by the political correctness rules
of society and therefore he has been pilloried as a warning to the rest of us.
Appropriately, Richard then went on to discuss the work of Yuri Besmenov, a
former KGB agent and defector from the Soviet Union
during the Cold War. He has revealed the psychological warfare tactics used by
communist agents who infiltrate and corrupt an enemy state in order to make it
become communist itself. What he reveals is deeply chilling because it's
exactly what I see in the world today being carried out by cultural Marxist
fifth column organizations like Common Purpose, the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt
School
Richard talked some more about the media and about how minor
issues are blown out of all proportion to cover bigger issues; the MP expenses
scandal and phone hacking inquest are examples. The real stories lie
underneath. I myself have always said: when a story like that breaks out on
page 1, look and see what's on page 15! According to Richard, the globalists
probably have their eyes fixed on Malaysia
right now. This is because it's predominantly Muslim, it has natural resources
and it has recently held a war crimes tribunal against Tony Blair and George W
Bush; it also doesn't currently owe any money to the World Bank and has not
sold off its gold at discount prices like most other countries. Could this be
why Malaysian Airlines have had such bad luck lately, losing two aircraft in
the space of a few months? Richard has calculated the odds of that happening by
chance and they're staggeringly small. However Skeptics will still say this is
"just a coincidence!" And this brings us on to the coincidence
fallacy. Nothing physically possible is so unlikely that you can say:
"This can NEVER happen!" therefore a Skeptic can use a coincidence call
to debunk almost anything. There needs to be a discussion about what
"level of likelihood" would become the universally agreed cut-off
point between what is to be considered random and what is to be considered
intentional, a statistical ceiling. This so far has never been done and
therefore coincidence has become something of a trump card for Skeptics, an
unfalsifiable wreaking ball that they can drive into any debate, see here for
more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/pan-pareidolia.html.
Richard paused the footage of the Malaysian trial of Blair and Bush and pointed
dramatically at the screen where Alfred Webre can be seen on the presiding
panel. Actually this is not a scoop by Richard; Alfred has said several times himself
how he took part in that war crimes tribunal.
However this was a good segueway into the subject of
controlled opposition in the Truth movement. I think it's fair to say that
Richard regards much of the rest of the Conspirasphere with suspicion and
disdain. Sometimes he is unfair, as I said in my review of the London
event, see above. This may be one of the reasons he has remained such a lone
wolf. He has never openly made unfounded accusations, but he has implied many
times that certain individuals within the UFO/conspiracy/paranormal community
are compromised. He is no doubt correct in some cases, but I caution him
against being overzealous. I've explained in a recent HPANWO TV production how
excessive and hasty shill-shaming can do far more harm than good, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-shill-squad.html.
One of the few people Richard does trust and works closely with is Andrew
Johnson who has also suggested several people as possible candidates for
cointelpro. A lot of Andrew's frustration comes from a very legitimate and
justified gripe: why has the 9/11 Truth movement been so reluctant to accept
the definitive research of Dr Judy Wood? In his book Andrew relates how 9/11
Truthers, who themselves have been misrepresented and ridiculed by believers in
the official nineteen hijackers story, go on themselves to misrepresent and ridicule Dr
Judy Wood and her discoveries when they really should know better, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1r65dE8rb4&list=PLvaxr0OSBw2DtOWulcA96d7sG2rsNyOgb.
I myself have fallen into conflict over this, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/the-911-civil-war.html.
Andrew is correct when he says that the "thermitically correct"
brigade is a controlled response to 9/11, but I suspect that most of the
antagonists he describes in his book are not knowing agents who are purposively
corrupting the 9/11 Truth Movement; they have merely come down with a failure
of nerve. They are frightened to step outside the norms created by the masters
of deception who are running the show. A good example of this is the
aforementioned Alfred Webre. Webre was interviewing Leuren Moret one day when he
interrupted her and told her not to mention Dr Judy Wood; why? The answer might
lie in my own experience with the "stop Kevin Annett!" cult; see the
link above to my film The Shill Squad.
Did Alfred join those people because he was rationally and politely persuaded?
I doubt it; based on their usual conduct I suspect he was bullied and browbeaten
into accepting their dogma. If so then this would mean he is not very resilient
when targeted by "truth mobs" and there have been some really nasty
examples of those truth mobs tying to chivvy and chase people away from Dr Judy
Wood. There are other kinds of norms in 9/11 Truth. In the UK
the "official" 9/11 Truth Movement is very sensitive about its image;
it is affiliated to the Stop the War Coalition... although I suspect that this
affiliation is one-way and the StWC doesn't reciprocate. However UK
9/11 Truth portrays itself as very middle class and centre left. It eschews
anything it considers too "far out" for their shop window, which is
why Dr Judy Wood is so unwelcome. Whenever they even bring up the subject of Dr
Judy Wood, or "Judy Wood" as they insist on calling her, their line tends to be more: "but what will people think of
us!?" instead of: "She's wrong because..." UKT-9/11 wants to be seen
as distinctly separate from the rest of the Conspirasphere, which is why I
didn't fit in there. I really must one day write a piece on my own experience
of my involvement with them, but my general unspoken feelings were well worded
by Joshua Blakeney, a British researcher based in Canada: "Do these people
really think that if they just spend enough time wearing suits and voting for
the Green Party then eventually The
Guardian will agree to investigate 9/11 Truth!?"
At the moment Richard awaits his challenge to engage our
Fearless Leader David Cameron is a live public debate... which would be hell of
a lot more exciting than the election debates that are on TV at the moment.
However his eyes have also turned skywards as questions are coming in about
Mars. At the moment there are several spacecraft on Mars, including mobile
rovers; however Richard is wondering if these missions are faked and the images
we see of the Red Planet are just pictures of remote locations on Earth; this
is similar to the notion that the moon landings were faked, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/programme-110-podcast-marcus-allen-part.html.
It's perfectly possible, after all if NASA can fake men on the moon, robots on
Mars shouldn't be a problem; they don't even have to worry about private
individuals with telescopes any more. Why would NASA fake data from Mars?
Perhaps because they're trying to cover up evidence of life there. Richard is
also changing his strategy to one much more proactive than reactive and he wants
to set up his own free energy research project, see: http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=203&part=1.
There are a few existing ones of these like Dr Steven Greer's, but this is not
to be trusted, see: http://www.siriusdisclosure.com/orion-project/energy-solutions/.
Michael Tellinger has just emailed his list with an announcement of a free
energy discovery; hope it's the real thing, but either way the more people who
research this subject the better.
Richard received a well-earned cheer at the end of his lecture.
At the time of writing his tour is still underway so do go and see him if you
can: http://www.richplanet.net/events.php.
Although we have definite differences of opinion, Richard is somebody I really
respect and we need more like him if we're going to see the end of this New
World Order... and we are.
It was getting late by the end of the event and Ustane and I had to catch a bus
so we couldn't stay around to talk to Richard, Andrew or any of our other
friends who had travelled there. As we left the Belgrave Rooms we saw Jenny
Kleeman interviewing a member of the audience. We walked quickly on by.
See here for the
latest HPANWO Voice articles: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/disclosure-champagne.html.
See here for the
latest HPANWIO TV films: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/helen-duncan-wartime-psychic-jailed.html.
See here for the
latest HPANWO Radio shows: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/programme-131-podcast-carla-buckle.html.
