Crop circle season is here again, and the first formations of 2008 are already appearing. At the time of writing there are two in southern England, the crop circle “heartland”, and one each in Italy and the United States, see: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/2008.html . As always the question invariably comes up: Who, or what, is responsible for these events? The crop circles have an interesting history. They first entered the public conscience in the 1970’s and 80’s, but the earliest crop circle reports date back to the 16th century in the Netherlands and the 17th Century in England; and the RAF took the first aerial crop circle photo in 1932 (Thomas 1999), but they remained virtually undiscussed until the 70’s. In 1991 two elderly Wiltshire men, Douglas Bowers and David Chorley, confessed to having perpetrating all of them as a hoax. They even created a simple circle on Central TV News to “prove it”. That was the end of it as far as the media were concerned; “Mystery solved!... What’s happening on Coronation Street?” (I'm ashamed to say that I fell for that one myself! I thought nothing of crop circles after that for more than 5 years until I saw Andy Thomas on Esther, Esther Rantzen's talk show, and I thought: "What!? Is it still going on!?") And to this day, for Conformism and science the answer is simple: They are a form of landscape art, made by ordinary people with a developed knack and using simple tools: surveyor’s measuring equipment, a garden roller and an invented tool called a “stalk-stomper”, a plank of wood with a loop of rope or chain attached. Is that all there is to the story? Are all crop circles simply the product of “Doug and Dave” and their protégés? You decide. Here's the website of the "plankers":http://www.circlemakers.org/
They’re an odd bunch. John Lundberg, the chief author of the site, emailed me once because I'd accused him of being a disinformer on the DarkConspiracy forum. In reflection I think I was being a bit harsh on him. I’ve no grounds to accuse him personally, and I don't see anything wrong with the plankers’ kind of landscape art (except for the damage it does to the farmer's field, although the farmers can make more than a compensating few bob off them if they know what they’re doing!), but there's no doubt that the circlemakers' activities is leading people to wrongly believe that every crop circle is made by the plankers. Even the plankers themselves don't claim that they've made all of them, although they water it down a bit; words to the effect of: "Well, no we don't know who made that one, so there must be circle-making gangs that we're not in touch with." (Matthew Williams- CFZ Weird Weekend 2006) The plankers are actually every bit as much “New Age” and "freaky" as most of the “croppies”, people like me who study crop circles as a paranormal phenomenon! They regularly report paranormal activity while they're making the circles. They carry out pagan ceremonies at their circlemaking sites too.
There's no doubt that some of the circles are made by the plankers, some even reckon it is the majority, but anyone who looks a little deeper will see that human activity cannot possibly account for the whole phenomenon. But how many people look deeper? Don't most people just switch off after reading stuff like the above picture? Does anyone look into the Leavengood Investigation, Lucy Pringle, Michael Glickman and all the other researchers who’ve concluded that the crop circles are not all man-made? Why doesn’t The Sun, "the People's Paper" report that?
Without accusing John Lundberg as a person outright again, it still pays not to underestimate the capacity of psyops and government disinformation. We’ve already seen, in other manifestations of the supernatural and otherworldy, that the authorities deliberately seed lies to put people off the scent of them: (EG:http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/03/roswells-galore.html ). They seem to have an almost knee-jerk aversion to strange phenomena, for whatever reason (which I explore elsewhere). Crop circles qualify as part of that department and I'd be far from surprised if the government initiated very broad and convincing propaganda to try and suppress the truth.