What's interesting about this is that once again we see an important person killed by a "lone nut"; just like JFK, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, John Lennon and many others. King's relatives were so sure that his supposed assassin, James Earl Ray, was innocent that they attended Ray's funeral when he died.
An important aspect to assassinations that are said to be done by "lone nuts" when they're really govt organized hits is what is known as "Prouty's Law". This states that the active role in the killing is carried out by the removal of the usual security measures that protect the victim. With JFK it was giving him an open-topped car to drive in and with 9/11 it was the shut down and confusion of NORAD caused by excersises. In 1974 a man called Samual Byck tried to assassinate President Nixon by crashing a plane into the White House, 9/11 style. He managed to hijack an airliner at an airport, but was killed before he could get off the ground when the police stormed the aircraft. This was an unsuccessful assassination attempt because Prouty's Law was not in effect.
Interestingly, if we apply Prouty's Law to Thursday's murder of the Pakistani stateswoman Benazir Bhutto, this is what we find: "Perhaps more shockingly, an attendee at the rally where Bhutto was killed says police charged with protecting her "abandoned their posts," leaving just a handful of Bhutto's own bodyguards protecting her." (Source: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Police_abandoned_security_posts_before_Bhutto_1228.html )
There are as many reasons why someone would want to kill Bhutto as there are people, but predictably it is being blamed on the mythical bogeyman "Al-Qaida" (An organization that actually doesn't exist!). In my opinion it's likely that she was taken out by the CIA. She used to be Pakistan's prime minister and she may well have returned to a powerful role in the forthcoming elections. the current PM, Parvez Musharaf, has been very cooperative with the American-led War on Terror, but Bhutto may well not have been.