Richard D Hall is a solo maverick in the truth movement. He
is fiercely independent and the only events he ever organizes are his own. I've
been to his live shows before, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/richplanet-live-in-london.html.
(See links column for Richard's website). I'd heard
some reports from others who'd attended his shows in the previous few days, but
I knew that his format could change at the last minute. His work is based
around current affairs so you never know what you're going to get untill you're
literally sitting in front of him. The 2015 Richplanet Tour is subtitled
"as NOT seen on TV" which is appropriate because Richard has had no
end of trouble from the television network related to his programme; they
forbid him from broadcasting all his best material and a few months ago they
banned him because of his episode with Nick Kollerstrom about the Woolwich
incident, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/chris-spivey-arrest-whos-next.html.
Showcase TV are not as "controversial" as they profess. It costs
Richard £600 to buy the airtime and he wonders "Is it worth it?" The
good news is that all his shows are available, completely uncensored, on his
website viewer, see link above. Ustane and I were familiar with the venue, as
we trudged up towards it we recalled the 2013 AMMACH conference which was held
there, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/ammach-conference-2013.html.
Also some years earlier we had seen the late Lloyd Pye give a lecture there.
The Belgrave Rooms are the city's Masonic centre and are covered with the
Brotherhood's occult symbolism, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/ammach-conference-2013-vox-pop.html.
However they have the cheapest function suite to hire in Nottingham ,
which makes it quite understandable that Richard and other would choose to book
it. I was keen to pick up Richard's latest DVD releases from his stall; two
full-length films. I was delighted to meet up with lots of my old friends; some
I knew would be there, with others it was a nice surprise. Some of them had
never met Ustane and it was nice to introduce them to her; the social side of
these events is equally important as the lecture content itself.
Richard D Hall bounded onto the stage in his trademark dark brown suit to thunderous applause from the audience, some of whom were standing at
the sides beside the packed seats. The first part of his talk was entitled: Subversion in the UK, although strictly
speaking a large part of this subversion relates to an incident that did not
happen in the UK ,
but in Portugal .
It was the subject of one of Richard's new films, the second part of his expose
of the Madeleine McCann case, called Buried
by Mainstream Media, the True Story of Madeleine McCann- The Phantoms. The
film opens with the same music that the first one does. I can't recall who
Richard gets to compose his theme tunes, he did tell me once, but they're
excellent at their job. Ustane and I find the score very poignant and we've
started calling it "Madeleine's Requiem". Madeleine McCann was three
years old in May 2007, the time she allegedly disappeared from a holiday villa
at an Algarve
resort in Portugal .
According to her parents they left her sleeping in a bedroom with her brother
and sister while they went to a restaurant for a meal just a short walk away. They
nipped back to the villa regularly to check on the children and on one of these
checks they found that somebody had broken in and abducted Madeleine. There was
a huge international media storm and campaigns to "find Maddy now!"
which raised millions of pounds. This second part of Richard's investigation
provides lots of new information and maybe even some answers. The only evidence
of any abduction of Madeleine comes from a few eyewitness accounts which are
very dubious in themselves. One of the McCann's friends, Jane Tanner, says that
she saw a man carrying a young child in his arms, yet the forensic artist's
depictions of the man, whom Richard calls "Tannerman", are very
vague; they even look a bit like Richard D Hall himself! What's more Ms Tanner
never mentioned him at the time. Strange how one would fail to tell the police
about a man seen carrying a child away from the apartment after knowing there's
been an abduction of a child there. Three other suspects were seen in the area.
In one case a man reported to the police that one of them had attempted to
abduct his daughter, yet for some reason he only came forward after Madeleine's
"abduction" had been publicized. The footprints of conspiracy lead on
to where the body of Brenda Leyland was found in a hotel near Leicester ,
see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/mccanns-twitter-troll-found-dead.html.
Richard managed to track down a former employee of the McCanns who says that
nothing in Jane Tanner's story makes sense. It makes even less sense when Ms
Tanner added more and more details to Tannerman's description, some of them, at
least, clearly imaginary. The second supposed suspect Richard christened
"Sagresman" because he was said to have been seen on the beach near
the village of Sagres on Cape St Vincent, about sixteen miles from Praia da Luz
where the McCanns and their friends were staying. It's chilly and windy there
in April and few people would have been on the beach, yet a father claims that
a man tried to kidnap his daughter there in late April, the 27th or 29th
(which!?). Yet for some reason this man didn't report it to the police until after Madeleine's disappearance; he also
sent the authorities on a wild goose chase across Europe to question a polish
holidaymaker and his wife. The father gave his name as Nuno Lourenco and
Richard suspects his story is a fantasy invented to support the idea that there
was a dangerous paedophile at large in the area who was intent on abducting a
young girl; this would make him an accomplice of the McCanns and their friends.
Another phantom suspect, "Smithman", crops up from a report in Ireland
by the Smith family from Drogehda. They claim to have seen a man walking down
to the beach just after Madeleine's disappearance; he was carrying a young girl
in his arms and he closely resembled Tannerman. However similar criticisms can
be made of their statements that were made of Jane Tanner's. The Smiths didn't
report their sighting for thirteen days, even though Madeleine's disappearance
had been on the headlines across the world since then. The confusion and
incompetence the Portuguese investigation suffered seems to have been the product
of a spanner in the works thrown by the English translator Robert Murat; was he
a mole working as part of the conspiracy too? He was eventually set up as
another suspect, one more red herring to thwart police progress. Despite the
disintegration of the Smithman farce, the story was promoted by Scotland Yard
and even thrown together into a superficially plausible "new lead"
that was included in a special report on Crimewatch
UK. The McCann team also propped up Smithman in their personal
publications, and it's covered by Kate McCann, Madeleine's mother, in her book.
The plot is thickened even more when, unbelievably, a fourth phantom is
revealed; he came forward to the police after over three years had passed and
claims to be Tannerman. He was a local father carrying his daughter home from a
creche. The Scotland Yard Crimewatch
photographs of "Crecheman" blur his face so he's not been revealed in
his full identity. Luckily Wendy Murphy, a legal expert on crimes against
children, has spoken publicly about her doubt. Another is the famous TV crime
reporter Shaw Taylor (sadly he's just died). I thought this odd at the time;
why was Madeleine McCann's case getting so much publicity when, sadly, children
disappearing like this is not unusual; in fact similar events happen literally
every day. Richard thinks Madeleine died in the apartment and her parents and
their friends disposed of the body, and they are covering up her death. The
evidence comes from searches of the scene by sniffer dogs which picked up the
smell of blood and dead bodies there. Also the McCanns' stories are full of
contradictions and very imprecise information. The McCanns' "charity"
is connected to some extremely untrustworthy people including high diplomatic
officials, media spin doctors from Tony Blair's government, fifth column
psychological mind-controllers and also supposed private investigators with
links to fraud, espionage and organized crime. Even the Pope offered his moral
support. The question is, did the parents murder Madeleine or did she die of
natural causes? If it's the latter then why didn't they just say so? They were
on holiday with a group of about seven friends, with children of their own,
"the Tapas Seven" as they've been christened, and it looks as though
they're involved too. Did one of the friends kill Madeleine? If so why are the
parents collaborating with them? If the parents are the culprits then why are
these friends collaborating with the McCanns? The entire group of people
surrounding the McCanns even tried to frame somebody for kidnapping Madeleine;
it's totally "Bob Lazar" as Richard himself would say. Why has
Madeleine McCann's supposed kidnapping been made such a cause celebre involving such high profile people, front-page
headlines and official institutions? There are no certain answers yet. Richard
speculates that it might have something to do with organized child abuse and
MI5 involvement in it, like at Kincora Boys Home. Possibly, we know MI5 were
involved in that, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/mi5-cover-up-kincora.html.
The DVD of this film can be purchased here: http://www.richplanet.net/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=256.
Richard D Hall's second new production is called An Independent Investigation into the
Cumbria Shootings- Patsy Driver; it is a new viewpoint on one of the worst
firearms offences in British history. The official story goes that Derrick
Bird, a mild-mannered taxi driver from Rowrah, Cumbria who had been behaving
perfectly normally up to that point, suddenly got up one morning in June 2010
and went on a killing spree; he shot dead twelve people and injured eleven
others before driving to an isolated rural lane and turning his gun on himself.
However, as is often the case, the truth behind the news is more complicated,
and it's deliberately hidden by the authorities. It does seem as if Derrick
Bird did carry out some of the attacks, but the evidence for the party line,
that he was the only killer, simply isn't there. Like Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan
Sirhan and Mark Chapman, he is a "patsy", somebody manipulated into
taking the blame for the secret crimes of others. In fact I think the Derrick
Bird incident has remarkable similarities to the Port
Arthur shooting in which a young man called Martin
Bryant supposedly gunned down people at a tourist cafe in Australia ;
but the evidence doesn't match, see: http://www.whale.to/b/viallspam.html.
In the case of Chapman, who allegedly shot John Lennon, and Sirhan, who is
supposed to have killed Robert Kennedy, the patsies were in a trance state and
probably under mind control, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/bobby-kennedy-two-gunmen.html.
The same possibility emerges in the Derrick Bird case, although Channel 4's
documentary on the subject was a typical pathetic primetime whitewash. As far
as the witnesses to the shootings go, not all of them saw the gunman and of
those only a few got a good look at his face. The witness who got the best look
at him describes him as somebody who is totally different to Bird in appearance.
As with 9/11 and 7/7, the CCTV evidence which has been released to the public,
is scant, ambiguous and, so it seems, specifically selected to conceal and mislead.
Richard's research is thorough and systematic; he retraces the route supposedly
taken by Bird that day and interviews some of the witnesses himself. The region
is a close-knit community and many of the residents knew Bird personally; they
all say that he was not somebody they would ever suspect of being a mass
murderer. There are also discrepancies in their testimonies. The gunman... or
gunmen's taxies were Citroen
Picassoes, but in some cases it's reported as greyish blue, on other cases
maroon. In Whitehaven the killer shot out his left quarterlight, yet in other
places the witnesses say that all the car's glass was intact. Some of the CCTV shows
a vehicle with a taxi sign on the roof, in others this is absent. Some of the
people involved with the victims are very reluctant to speak to the media, and
one of them called the police when Richard approached them. The people who live
in the inland areas in the later part of Bird's supposed rampage are the most
cagey of all and Richard says: "It's like drawing teeth to get them to
make a statement after Seascale!". I had a similar reception in Nottingham
when making inquiries about Helen Duncan, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/helen-duncan-most-dangerous-psychic-in.html.
Neil Sanders is featured in the film in a few scenes describing how
"Manchurian candidates" can be programmed using the methods developed
many years ago during the CIA's MK Ultra project (see here for more information
on Neil's work: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/programme-20-podcast-neil-sanders.html).
Was Derrick Bird one of these hypnotized assassins? Were other operatives
driving different cars used to carry out some of the other killings? Was bird
murdered? He might have been shot by somebody else, like Oswald was by Jack
Ruby, or programmed to shoot himself. Either way the end result was that there
were no suspects to try for murder and the legalities of the case were dealt
with by a coroner's inquest. These are much easier to rig than criminal trials.
If the official story is true and Derrick Bird was the proverbial "lone
nut" then why would he do it? The papers have tabled a whole array of
motives, that he was angry over financial issues, even though he had £22,000 in
the bank. He also supposedly had woman trouble and issues at work. Also apparently
the taxman was after him, even though he was not eligible to pay tax. His first
alleged victim was his own twin brother, although there's little evidence to
link Bird with the killing; the same goes for his solicitor Kevin
Commons Kevin Commons
Richard has been approached several times by mainstream
media and in the London lecture
last year (see link above) he explains how he was asked by Plum Pictures to
take part in The Great UFO Conspiracy
while they were in preproduction. He wisely told them where to go, as did I; the
end result has completely vindicated us, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/letters-of-complaint.html.
However the word has not got round yet because a lady called Jenny Kleeman
asked him to take part in a "documentary" she is making about
alternative views on the fate of Madeleine McCann... you can guess what Richard
said. Then lo and behold, she turns up at the event! Actually she just hung
around outside hoping to get a vox populi
on Richard's talk (if you ask me I think she fancies him!). Richard talked more
about the media, highlighting something I've noticed myself, but not given much
thought to. Because newspaper sales are dropping, newspaper stands are found in
places they would not have been a few years ago, like supermarkets and
department stores. Also more free papers are coming out, most notably Metro, a paper that people can just pick
up and read from free racks on busses and trains etc; it makes all its income
from its ad pages. Another trick the media use is to create false role-models
and Richard asked his viewers to vote on who they thought was the biggest of
these. I voted for Russell Brand; I said: "Russell
Brand, a man who is being very highly promoted in the mainstream for his
supposed anti-establishment views. Brand
used to be a friend of David Icke and knows about the idea that 9/11 was an inside
job, but will not say so publicly. David told him: 'Walk the talk or walk
away!' and they haven't spoken since. Brand is being led along by his giant ego
and his puppet masters feed it to make him do whatever they want him to." Brand
is bringing out a film very soon about bankers, but will it be anything other
than controlled opposition? Doubt it, but we'll find out; I'll review it. However,
Brand was beaten into second place by the man anybody who knows me will have thought I was going to vote for, that
smiling Simeon of the small screen, Prof. Brian Cox. I've written about Cox an
awful lot, maybe too much, but I stand by what I've been saying; His Royal
Coxness is playing a very important and unique role in media mind control and
disinformation, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/prof-brian-cox-watch-this-space.html.
Other nominated media reaction agents include Stephen Fry; he presents a comedy
quiz show called QI and it has a very
Skeptic-based theme. He recently appeared on Irish TV presenting some rather
theologically weak arguments for atheism; and his co-host on QI is none other than Dan Schreiber,
presenter of The Great UFO Travesty, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-great-ufo-conspiracy-review.html.
Jeremy Clarkson was also nominated by a few of the voters. Clarkson has been in
trouble many times at the BBC, for instance he once described a very dark place
as: "dark as Lenny Henry in a cave!" Lenny Henry being a well-known
black comedian. That metaphor is completely benign as far as I can see yet
there was uproar; black celebrities came on TV to say how disgusted they were
and "race relations" groups lambasted him. Clarkson doesn't care and
I respect him for that. Interestingly it's in the news at the moment that
Clarkson has been sacked from his job at the BBC; therefore somebody with the
initials "JC" is being crucified at Easter... you have to credit the
Loomies for their sense of humour! I got into a heated argument with somebody
over Clarkson because this person I know thinks that anybody who so much as
mentions Clarkson has fallen for a simple distraction psy-op; I disagree. I
think there is an agenda over Clarkson; but it's not distraction, it's cultural
Marxism. Jeremy Clarkson has failed to abide by the political correctness rules
of society and therefore he has been pilloried as a warning to the rest of us.
Appropriately, Richard then went on to discuss the work of Yuri Besmenov, a
former KGB agent and defector from the Soviet Union
during the Cold War. He has revealed the psychological warfare tactics used by
communist agents who infiltrate and corrupt an enemy state in order to make it
become communist itself. What he reveals is deeply chilling because it's
exactly what I see in the world today being carried out by cultural Marxist
fifth column organizations like Common Purpose, the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt
School
Richard talked some more about the media and about how minor
issues are blown out of all proportion to cover bigger issues; the MP expenses
scandal and phone hacking inquest are examples. The real stories lie
underneath. I myself have always said: when a story like that breaks out on
page 1, look and see what's on page 15! According to Richard, the globalists
probably have their eyes fixed on Malaysia
right now. This is because it's predominantly Muslim, it has natural resources
and it has recently held a war crimes tribunal against Tony Blair and George W
Bush; it also doesn't currently owe any money to the World Bank and has not
sold off its gold at discount prices like most other countries. Could this be
why Malaysian Airlines have had such bad luck lately, losing two aircraft in
the space of a few months? Richard has calculated the odds of that happening by
chance and they're staggeringly small. However Skeptics will still say this is
"just a coincidence!" And this brings us on to the coincidence
fallacy. Nothing physically possible is so unlikely that you can say:
"This can NEVER happen!" therefore a Skeptic can use a coincidence call
to debunk almost anything. There needs to be a discussion about what
"level of likelihood" would become the universally agreed cut-off
point between what is to be considered random and what is to be considered
intentional, a statistical ceiling. This so far has never been done and
therefore coincidence has become something of a trump card for Skeptics, an
unfalsifiable wreaking ball that they can drive into any debate, see here for
more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/pan-pareidolia.html.
Richard paused the footage of the Malaysian trial of Blair and Bush and pointed
dramatically at the screen where Alfred Webre can be seen on the presiding
panel. Actually this is not a scoop by Richard; Alfred has said several times himself
how he took part in that war crimes tribunal.
However this was a good segueway into the subject of
controlled opposition in the Truth movement. I think it's fair to say that
Richard regards much of the rest of the Conspirasphere with suspicion and
disdain. Sometimes he is unfair, as I said in my review of the London
event, see above. This may be one of the reasons he has remained such a lone
wolf. He has never openly made unfounded accusations, but he has implied many
times that certain individuals within the UFO/conspiracy/paranormal community
are compromised. He is no doubt correct in some cases, but I caution him
against being overzealous. I've explained in a recent HPANWO TV production how
excessive and hasty shill-shaming can do far more harm than good, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-shill-squad.html.
One of the few people Richard does trust and works closely with is Andrew
Johnson who has also suggested several people as possible candidates for
cointelpro. A lot of Andrew's frustration comes from a very legitimate and
justified gripe: why has the 9/11 Truth movement been so reluctant to accept
the definitive research of Dr Judy Wood? In his book Andrew relates how 9/11
Truthers, who themselves have been misrepresented and ridiculed by believers in
the official nineteen hijackers story, go on themselves to misrepresent and ridicule Dr
Judy Wood and her discoveries when they really should know better, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1r65dE8rb4&list=PLvaxr0OSBw2DtOWulcA96d7sG2rsNyOgb.
I myself have fallen into conflict over this, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/the-911-civil-war.html.
Andrew is correct when he says that the "thermitically correct"
brigade is a controlled response to 9/11, but I suspect that most of the
antagonists he describes in his book are not knowing agents who are purposively
corrupting the 9/11 Truth Movement; they have merely come down with a failure
of nerve. They are frightened to step outside the norms created by the masters
of deception who are running the show. A good example of this is the
aforementioned Alfred Webre. Webre was interviewing Leuren Moret one day when he
interrupted her and told her not to mention Dr Judy Wood; why? The answer might
lie in my own experience with the "stop Kevin Annett!" cult; see the
link above to my film The Shill Squad.
Did Alfred join those people because he was rationally and politely persuaded?
I doubt it; based on their usual conduct I suspect he was bullied and browbeaten
into accepting their dogma. If so then this would mean he is not very resilient
when targeted by "truth mobs" and there have been some really nasty
examples of those truth mobs tying to chivvy and chase people away from Dr Judy
Wood. There are other kinds of norms in 9/11 Truth. In the UK
the "official" 9/11 Truth Movement is very sensitive about its image;
it is affiliated to the Stop the War Coalition... although I suspect that this
affiliation is one-way and the StWC doesn't reciprocate. However UK
9/11 Truth portrays itself as very middle class and centre left. It eschews
anything it considers too "far out" for their shop window, which is
why Dr Judy Wood is so unwelcome. Whenever they even bring up the subject of Dr
Judy Wood, or "Judy Wood" as they insist on calling her, their line tends to be more: "but what will people think of
us!?" instead of: "She's wrong because..." UKT-9/11 wants to be seen
as distinctly separate from the rest of the Conspirasphere, which is why I
didn't fit in there. I really must one day write a piece on my own experience
of my involvement with them, but my general unspoken feelings were well worded
by Joshua Blakeney, a British researcher based in Canada: "Do these people
really think that if they just spend enough time wearing suits and voting for
the Green Party then eventually The
Guardian will agree to investigate 9/11 Truth!?"
At the moment Richard awaits his challenge to engage our
Fearless Leader David Cameron is a live public debate... which would be hell of
a lot more exciting than the election debates that are on TV at the moment.
However his eyes have also turned skywards as questions are coming in about
Mars. At the moment there are several spacecraft on Mars, including mobile
rovers; however Richard is wondering if these missions are faked and the images
we see of the Red Planet are just pictures of remote locations on Earth; this
is similar to the notion that the moon landings were faked, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/programme-110-podcast-marcus-allen-part.html.
It's perfectly possible, after all if NASA can fake men on the moon, robots on
Mars shouldn't be a problem; they don't even have to worry about private
individuals with telescopes any more. Why would NASA fake data from Mars?
Perhaps because they're trying to cover up evidence of life there. Richard is
also changing his strategy to one much more proactive than reactive and he wants
to set up his own free energy research project, see: http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=203&part=1.
There are a few existing ones of these like Dr Steven Greer's, but this is not
to be trusted, see: http://www.siriusdisclosure.com/orion-project/energy-solutions/.
Michael Tellinger has just emailed his list with an announcement of a free
energy discovery; hope it's the real thing, but either way the more people who
research this subject the better.
Richard received a well-earned cheer at the end of his lecture.
At the time of writing his tour is still underway so do go and see him if you
can: http://www.richplanet.net/events.php.
Although we have definite differences of opinion, Richard is somebody I really
respect and we need more like him if we're going to see the end of this New
World Order... and we are.
It was getting late by the end of the event and Ustane and I had to catch a bus
so we couldn't stay around to talk to Richard, Andrew or any of our other
friends who had travelled there. As we left the Belgrave Rooms we saw Jenny
Kleeman interviewing a member of the audience. We walked quickly on by.
See here for the
latest HPANWO Voice articles: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/disclosure-champagne.html.
See here for the
latest HPANWIO TV films: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/helen-duncan-wartime-psychic-jailed.html.
See here for the
latest HPANWO Radio shows: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/programme-131-podcast-carla-buckle.html.
56 comments:
Lots of interesting things going on Ben, thanks for the write up, especially on 9/11 & RDH. I didn't know D. Icke said that to R. Brand. I really wish Ickey would walk the talk himself though and promote Dr Wood's stuff, although I know he does sell her book. He could make a big impact, but maybe that's just it...it could be very dangerous for him.
Of course it's easy for internet truthers like myself to judge, but I cannot help making this important observation.
You're welcome, Hilary. glad you like it, thanks :-) Unfortunately David's not that clued up on 9/11. He promoted AET9/11 and Niels Harrit etc. This was not through malice or agenda, just ignorance.
A comprehensive reportage of a memorable evening, Ben!
I discovered a coincidence today Ben (or is it a coincidence? :-))
It seems that Jenny Kleeman has something in common with someone else who was mentioned many times on Wednesday night. Have a look at the client list of this agency...
http://www.sueridermanagement.co.uk/
Bloody hell, Neil. the Coxxxer himself! Is that a coincidence??? His wife is there too, Gia Milinovich. She's a feminist and a member of the Lifeboat Foundation that looks very Agenda 21.
:-) Yes Ben! I also see Dr. Christian Jessen who you would have had dealings with had you taken up the kind offer of appearing on Weighing Up The Enemy
http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/weighing-up-enemy.html
Also there is Prof. Jeff Forshaw who has co-authored two 'gate-keeping' books with Cox, and Dr. Lucie Green who plays a major role in 'Stargazing Live', which Cox presents.
Not being a sceptic or skeptic I am not qualified to judge whether any of the above is a coincidence and it is purely my intuition that tells me that these people may have possibly met each other and/or interacted with each other on some level on at least one occasion. Possibly.
Hold on - Ben..what about the rumours Richard Hall is an ex-copper????
Holding a meeting in a masonic hall???
Ben - the clues are there...!
The jungle of disinformation and limited hangouts is not easy to surf through, Anon ;-)
Please anon, let's stick to verifiable evidence, not rumours. Richard D Hall doesn't present us with rumours. Andrew Johnson doesn't present us with speculation unless he tells us that it is just that. Ben doesn't dabble in rumour.
I heard a rumour that 'anon' is not your real name...:-)
I am aware of many of the professional projects that Richard has been involved with as an electrical engineer, after qualification...not sure that that would have left much time for a career in the police force. But that's just speculation on my part.
Excellent piece thanks Ben! I went to Richard's Brighton event. Perfect, packed: just an amazing night. His attention to detail in phenomenal. I then spent yesterday watching his two DVDs...I'll donate them to a charity shop in the hope that someone will pick up the DVDs and become a new 'question everything' person! To the person above...Richard openly says that his brother is a copper. And the fact that his Brighton show was in a music venue doesn't mean he is a rockstar!
If you haven't already donated those dvds I would love to have them. ..you could pop them in a small envelope. ..any postage I would gladly reimburse you...please let me know. ....jasonralphenglish@gmail.com
If you haven't already donated those dvds I would love to have them. ..you could pop them in a small envelope. ..any postage I would gladly reimburse you...please let me know. ....jasonralphenglish@gmail.com
Great to see you again Ben and to meet Neil Austin, Neil Sanders and Andrew Johnson in person too oh and not forgetting Moggy, Catherine and Jo from Truth Juice Hull. What an evening !!!! Great write-up thanks mate and see you at Holmfirth if not before. Oh by the way we are having a trip to the coast for Sarah Goodley's Beltane meet up (may-day weekend) and managed to persuade Steve Johnson to come too if you fancy coming along and we could collect you from the train or coach station if you need it. see www.spiritofthemarsh.com
Good piece. I would disagree with Richard's evaluation of the Smith family sighting, though. Smith went to the Garda (Irish police) on his return from holidaying in Praia da Luz. He did this in response to a TV news report showing Gerry McCann walking down the aircraft steps holding an infant. He was so shocked at the similarity to his sighting in PdL that he made a statement at the Garda station. This is not something that is done lightly in Ireland, believe me...
I have seen a couple of RDH shows...2013 was when he was at his best..since then he has become far too suspicious (or jealous??)of anyone who dares to challenge his 'research'. Could be asperger's I guess. I met a friend of his at the Brum show in 2013...she was a beautiful intelligent bird who I met again a few months ago. I asked her about RDH and she said he had ceased contact because he thought she was plant, journalist or on the make...she was none of those things just someone with a healthy interest in all things conspiracy...and a few great stories to tell. RDH is one of many now; Ian R Crane is a more intelligent convincing researcher.
Rdh has to be on his guard. ..he gets so close to the truth that the powers that be want him to shut up
Just one point, the first I came to which I know for a fact to be totally false about the McCann case - OF COURSE Jane Tanner reported her sighting of a man carrying a child at the time!! This can be easily verified by consulting the police files. She reported it as soon as the police arrived.
Is that really the standard of research in this marathon film?? I won't be wasting any time on it if so.
Laurence: please actually read the evidence.
Mr Smith made two separate statements to the Guardai, separated by about 4 months. In the first he and his entire family were sure the man was NOT a tourist, but also that they would be unlikely to recognise him again. After a summer of relentless media attention, including the attempted framing of the parents, he (and he alone - the rest of his family did not concur) concluded this had probably been Gerry McCann. Absolutely worthless evidence as his recollection had clearly been tainted by '100%' DNA matches that never existed. It's a scandal alright, but not quite the way you think.
RDH is a complete shill...he hijacks other poeple ideas...he has no real knowledge when actually asked to expand...I am surprised a lot of you are impressed...there are far more sensible researchers/truthers out there...he runs at the first hint of being challenged. He hasn't uncovered ANYTHING new in ANY of his shows/films. If you research his subjects properly you will see his 'information' is available on websites and newspapers previously. Ian R Crane, Andy Thomas etc are far more reliable sources.
Just a quick comment to the 'RDH has to be on his guard' 9th May: I agree that people within this community have to be careful but equally being too cautious makes them miss the possibilities of other opinions / stories and more importantly the truth. I too have met that friend of RDH and I can confirm that she is genuine and just hugely interested in this subject: an interest borne apparently from the death of her brother. She may ask questions and make notes at seminars but that is because she is genuinely interested, dilligent and careful to be well-informed, nothing sinister. Also, she attends these events alone and being an attractive female does invite unwelcome attention from the mainly male audience. I guess she thinks holding a notebook and writing gives her some protection in some way. My wife and I have spoken at length with her at various times and both agree she is just a lovely lady. I like RDH but he does seem to be getting a little big for his boots, straying off subjects he is comfortable with and re-inventing himself as some sort of investigative reporter, which he isn't and never will be. I personally don't think he is even on the radar of any Government department. Sorry, Richard you are not that important. Somebody like Icke isn't even an issue any more. Happy hunting everyone for the one thing that appears to elude us all and that is the truth.
Anon 17 May: My understanding was that the second official statement by Smith was a reaction to seeing McCann walk down the aircraft landing steps following McCann's return to England. Of course, it is a given that (a) Smith could be completely wrong and/or a charlatan and (b) I am overestimating the abilities of the Garda Síochána.
Other posters: Whatever you may think of RD Hall, you should give the man credit for his knowledge on electronics/computers. As a result, he knows his stuff when it comes to anything based around secret technology/ufology and indeed has much to say on the monetary system. Where he lets himself down, IMO, is with the Muslim-related terrorism stuff and with the Neil Sanders business, which he looks terribly uncomfortable with on camera (and quite rightly so).
Further to RDH and his supposed knowledge of electronics and computers. I understand he did a degree in electrical engineering and worked for a while in that field. He is certainly no expert. He has previously tried to become an actor, a footballer amongst other things. He got interested in all of this 'conspiracy stuff' in about 2008, as have lots of others with far superior knowledge without the fame hungry/attention seeking aspects. I think RDH plays to the camera and he doesn't have time for real experts as he knows that he would be uncovered for what he really is. Gary Hessletine is a true expert and believer. Richard Hall is neither.
Anon 25 May 1842: I simply don't catch your drift regarding the accusations of attention seeking. If anything, RD is selling himself short. As far as I can tell, Hall is conducting his investigations at cost - a far cry from the remunerated tailor's dummies on mainstream. As for the rest, Richard has featured Heseltine, Andrew Johnson, Wilson and Blackett et al. on multiple occasions, all of whom could be considered experts in their fields. Finally, I shall refer you to a Richplanet show where he takes you through a reconstruction of greater than unity energy device, which requires very sound knowledge of circuits/programming. Which leaves me with no more to say, other than believe none of what you hear, half of what you see, and less than half of what you read on comments sections of websites run by hospital porters. I'm Laurence...good evening.
I'm Charlotte...hello. Laurence I have to take issue - of course Hall has the experts on his 'show' - he has to be seen in the company of these people to be taken seriously. I have attended a couple of his tours and the AV (twice) amongst a number of other peoples talks or lectures as Hall pretentiously refers to them, so I feel able to comment. I agree with the previous commenter that Andy Thomas and Ian Crane stick out as genuine researchers. Hall did not. I agree that he has some knowledge - the unity energy device explantion showing this (yes, I did see the show). I cannot warm to him at all. He definitely has tunnel vision, a dangerous curse of an investigator. I agree with somebody elses comment that this is perhaps Asperger's or Autistic tendencies coming to the fore. He coveres subjects now that he doesn't know about and should stick to what he started out with in the beginning if he wants to contiune being a serious researcher. Unlike some, Hall included, I make my own mind up but I retain an open mind. Incidentally, what somebody does for a living should have no bearing on their ability to make comments. Hospital Porters are a dedicated crew I am sure and I do seem to remember that Mr Hall had quite a fascination for them when doing his programme when it was actually interesting, informative and without him trying to be something he is not.Let us not forget he has not been a victim or had first hand experience of any ufo's and he did strat out trying to be an actor, which to me says it all really. I don't want to berate the man, he is trying to earn a buck but let us not fall in to thinking that he is some sort of conspiracy guru because he is not. Perhaps when he has published many books, toured the world and perhaps experienced a few things himself I might then take notice again. He is no Timothy Good or David Icke that is for sure.
Charlotte 28 May 1532: Firstly, we are on the same page on some of the points you raise. For example, I completely agree that RD should stick to ufology, primarily and any subject matter close to ufology (secret space programmes, top-secret US craft and the like). This is where he is strongest and can bring his electronics/magnetism/power-generation knowledge to bear. Ufology also happens to be by far the most interesting to most viewers. In addition, I note the dearth in recent times of the 'starship' which is a big loss IMO, instead relying on face-to-face interviews in various locations. (BTW, the interviews with Andrew Johnson in that latter's study remind me of visiting my pals houses after school to see their Commodore 64, Amiga or Atari ST.)
Now that we are agreed on that point, I would take issue with amateur diagnosis, particularly in the area of psychology. This is a general comment that I would recommend to anyone, not just you. I personally find Hall to be good on camera and am not surprised to learn of his interest in a stage career, although being unaware of this interest previously. Having had a dozen jobs myself, I wouldn't hold a bit of career-jumping against him.
Finally, I did not mean any disrespect to hospital porters. God knows, I've been ferried around by them often enough to appreciate them :)
Laurence...it's Charlotte...Thank you for your feedback...constructive criticism is always welcome ...comments regarding the backdrop of AJ's boxroom/study are hilarious and spot on. I don't mind a bit of career jumping either BUT when you profess an interest in something so specific as conspiracy/ufology I would imagine (like myself) that the interest has been there from a young age/and / or perhaps from an experience etc. Hall just seems to have jumped on a bandwagon in his 40's (nothing wrong with the age btw, I am nearly there!) but he doesn't actually have a huge knowledge of the subjects he discusses at all...and it all seems a little contrived. As someone previously commented he could be a 'shill'?? Perhaps I think my knowledge is more superior !! Anyway..we now agree that we think hospital porters deserve every penny they get. It's a good start !
He could indeed be a 'shill'...but I think not..he done an excellent job exposing the human mutilation cover up...as well as the animal mutilation. .he got thrown off the telly for exposing the maddie scandal...would a 'shill'do this???
Weather he is or he isn't. .he still brings good knowledge and facts to our attention. .the only thing that bothers me is when he bad mouthed miles johnston
What about when he bad-mouthed the couple who wrote the book The Madness Shared By Two - which is actually a HUGE conspiracy and a great story. Mr Hall deemed it tosh for some reason (jealousy??) and ridiculed David McCann to the point that he ended up having to issue a grovelling apology - quite rightly so. I completely went of Richard Hall then and there, I even gave away tickets for his tour as I thought that he definitely lacked credibility. He made a mockery of a very serious subject and I have to admit grave misgivings about him at that point. He could of course be a 'shill', just as David Icke could be a well. It is intriguing how he was recently known to be asking for public perceptions as to whom in the public eye could be 'plants' and mentioned Prof. Brian Cox as one possible candidate (jealousy again??) Who knows. Shills uncover certain things and gain further information by doing so. He didn't exactly get thrown off the tv; he was suspended for a while and then got another shot but on a weaker time slot and weaker subjects. Do not forget that Mr Hall PAYS for the slot. He isn't some tv star that is head-hunted. You or I could make a film and PAY for a satellite tv station to air it. He doesn't even have a forum (not for at least 3 years) as he doesn't like the comments. Well, Mr H if you can't stand the heat...blah blah. I have simply lost the faith with him. There are far more credible and well-informed dedicated researchers out there. Bennett & Percy (Dark Moon) for two and I agree about Ian R Crane being very good but for me Andy Thomas and Jesse Ventura (I know I know!) stand out.
The level of criticism of Richard D on this forum is striking. Particularly so when one considers that RD is essentially trying to throw light, in a very honest manner IMO, on unpopular subjects.
It appears that the critics fall into two categories, namely (1) contributors like Charlotte with a strong background in ufology and other areas who appear to have good reason to see RD as a Johnny-come-lately amateur, albeit in certain areas and (2) anonymous critics who suspect RD of being in on the conspiracy. I believe we can safely dismiss the second category as a hazard of the job. RD, however, could (should) reasonably silence the first category of critics by sticking to what he knows best: technical analysis of UFO's/secret space programmes/top-secret US craft, hosted from the 'starship'.
By meddling in (a) Islamic terrorism in the US and Europe, (b) the McCann case, and (c) what can only be described as Neil Sanders-related investigations, it appears that RD has opened an unholy can of worms.
Thank you Laurence...the voice of reason... from Charlotte.
RDH is just a shill...total phoney
I agree that he is a shill...not respected amongst the hardcore truthers.
with new information. I have found it extremely useful.
Fetal Monitor
I contact him and This was even faster than I could dream of. Thank you for taking time to listen to me and answering all my emails Dr.Agbazara. I feel emotional strong again. My confidence is back and I see my future clearly. I am forever grateful for your help in re-uniting me with my old lover who divorce left me years ago for another woman.you will see for your self what am saying when you contact this great spell caster called Dr.Agbazara on: (agbazara@gmail.com) or call him on (+2348104102662) and get your problems solved.
i am interested to read some comments that question RDH. Me and my girlfriend really look forward to new rdh videos on the web site (we have no tv). BUT the standard of richard's work is plummeting at times. I would also support the assertion that RDH rejects all criticism and often just differences of opinion. He then just cuts people out!
I wrote to him wrt judy wood. I was not dismissing her work out of hand, far from it, but i did notice some very strange inconsistencies in her presentations. At first he replied with explanations giving a positive view of her. But when i pressed the points that i had actually drawn attention to ..... he cut me off and doesnt respond at all on any subject, even if i am supporting his work or trying to give him good contacts for further research. I had written to him previously on the physics of ufo's and he was interested then. (i am trained in physics to a first class honours degree level, although some years back)
eg Judy Wood in one of his videos criticises stephen jones in a press conference where jones raises his arm to signal cold fusion doesnt exist. By doing so jones uses peer pressure in a public situation to influence the panel and the viewers. I agree with this analysis. BUT judy wood then immediately does something very similar on RDH in the same interview and raises her hand with a copy of her book and says "This is all the evidence you need" . She then even rejects a new inquiry into 9/11 because all the evidence is in her book. This is obviously complete and utter nonsense! How can she reject a new inquiry into 9/11 on that basis? Well she can and does, but it has nothing to do with opening new scientific research and reexamining the evidence through a proper scientific investigation. It is all about closure and promoting her case and her book. But RDH despite his tag line on every show, follows her like a puppy. He repeatedly recreates the very same action that she showed him in that video ....... often on his tours he will interrupt a point and pop behind a screen, raise up a copy of her book in his hand, and say "this is all the evidence you need".
That isnt scientific. That isnt open minded. That is not independent thinking..... he just repeats the same action and words that she showed him and peculiarly she taught him that action while lambasting stephen jones for using the same technique! To make it even more strange we can see this double standard actually recorded on a RDH interview with Judy Wood ....... and then we can see its success on RDH even in his recent tours. Very odd behaviour in fully recorded public view.
Another strange inconsistency with RDH is his analysis that MP.s are either dumb, conformist, distracted or corrupt ..... yet he encourages us to write to our MP's? How can the democratic system be portrayed as a corporate puppet mask (which i agree with) but at the same time we shouldn't lose faith in writing to our MP's? Why does he keep on encouraging his viewers to do this?
Good post....thanks for sharing.. very useful for me i will bookmark this for my future needs. Thanks.
Toshiba PVT-375BT
No Name - you are so right ! RDH does cut people off. A good friend of mine from Gloucestershire met him a couple of times (I think they were dating a little bit) - she had the audacity to challenge him on a couple of things - he clearly prefers his women submissive - and he turned really nasty with her and never contacted her again. She is a lovely, genuine and informed person but he just dismissed anything she asked. He does act biased where Judy Wood is concerned and Andrew Johnson, though to be fair Johnson does have some valid points. RDH has lost all credibility and thinks he is some sort of conspiracy Messiah. He isn't. There are plenty of better informed and more personable pleasant characters out there.
lol how nothing in these pityful comments adress content. Maybe some more apes care to comment on their ''investigation and analysis''of physical appearence, competences in communication and holding up a book.
ahahaha
Regan Teresa...lots of us have commented on the content of RDH's presentations...it is called debate and yes, his personality etc does come into it as it is part of him and his delivery/investigation/interviewing technique...incidentally perhaps instead of spending time sticking up for RDH perhaps you could address your competency regarding grammer and spelling??
hi anonymous :)
yes. I still read watch and listen to rdh, but when he behaves in these ways it seriously undermines his credibility. I can understand that he has to be on his guard and we all get a bit precious about our viewpoints but i sometimes wince at his behaviour. For example wrt the cumbrian shootings. He was very heavy handed at times and was it really a surprise that as he reached the geographical end of the killings that people had clammed up? It looked to me like his reputation had preceded him and he had upset people. Like he actually cast doubt on whether a couple of guys had actually been shot! One of them even gave him an interview. But it was mickey mouse 'forensics' to say the least. i would have been furious if that had happened to me.
such a shame that ego and the need to make a living can make people take shortcuts.
His ego has been the main reason he has lost ALL credibility and also the fact that he is tackling subjects he has no clue about....I would say go back to the day job but I don't think he ever had a proper one apart from DESPERATELY wanting to be an actor....says it all really doesn't it.
kul post
Hall is a shill....how does he fund his 'research'.....somebody is paying the bills...but I suggest they ask for a refund as he is absolutely dire and has nothing new to offer.
He had a lush girlfriend at Birmingham who I met about 2.5 years ago,she had a french name but was a Brit and really knew her stuff. She probably moved on as he is pretty thick.
I spoke to her too,Charlotte or something like that. She was really interesting about souls/afterlife. Her brother had died or something. Yeah, she was VERY fit. Richard Hall is ridiculous now. Just bangs on about animal mutilations and nothing else. He is out of his depth.
Hi...I think I might be 'Charlotte' (!!)Richard has some strange views nowadays which is a shame as he started out with some great ideas and a good format. He has quite a following which is good for him but I feel that he isn't uncovering anything new any more. I wish him well....and thanks anonymous for saying I am fit !
With Car Rental 8 you can discover cheap car rental at over 50000 international locations.
Keep updating us.
parking luton airport
airport parking luton
This is something that is very interesting.
parking Luton airport
airport parking luton
Keep it up. meet and greet luton airport
Some ringtones for you!
Guala – G-Eazy, Carnage Ringtone
Resurrection Ringtone
Life Of The Party Ringtone
where to buy buprenorphine online Buying Buprenorphine 0.2mg Online is regularly used for adults who connection the infection of pain dismissing, and irritation Relief. It is a pill which relaxes. Apposite width of medicine will give you comfort and quiet. Buy Generic Buprenorphine Online When you take it in torment you will feel extremely relax in a couple of minutes. Where To buy Buprenorphine Online is a pill which gives you fulfillment in your agony yet it is conceivable just when you will take it as per Doctor solution. You can also buy Buprenorphine by using your credit card and other related resources by a safe home delivery method.
https://sites.google.com/view/buprenrophine Buprenorphine is a semisynthetic pain reliever that is developed from the chemicals and these chemicals are actually acquired from the opium poppy. Buprenorphine is made by the substance known as thebaine, thebaine extracts from the opium poppy. It indicates that Buprenorphine is a semisynthetic opioid. In medical terminology, the opioid is the medications which derived from the opium poppy. The opioid is an incredible painkiller medication and its effects are more significant than other medications.
خدمات شركتنا ركن كلين للخدمات المنزلية
1-شركة تنظيف موكيت بالرياض
2-شركة تنظيف كنب بالرياض
3-شركة تنظيف مجالس بالرياض
4-شركة مكافحة الفئران بالرياض
5-شركة مكافحة الصراصير بالرياض
6-شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بالرياض
Hi, thank you for this interesting post. It's really cool
Post a Comment