Thursday, 26 November 2009
UFO Disclosure- This Year?
See this: http://www.ufodigest.com/news/1109/imminent.php
I'll believe it when I see it!
To be honest I can't see how we can never have willing Disclosure. I saw Steve Bassett live a couple of months ago and, although he's a well-meaning chap, he's naive. He bravely claimed that Disclosure would happen this year, but will it? I doubt it; just think what would happen if we came to the knowledge, not only that UFO's exist, but that the governments know they exist and kept it from us. It would be the first in a long line of dominoes that would inevitably fall, including a domino that says: "UFO's have crashed on the Earth and that governments have secretly salvaged them, and back-engineered their power-sources and propulsion systems". We're talking about Free Energy here! Free, safe, clean, infinite and eternal Energy (See this HPANWO TV vid for more details: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2009/09/freikraft.html). And this is not just related to UFO's; the great inventor Nikola Tesla discovered Free Energy over 50 years before Roswell and many of his papers are still classified under military intelligence laws. Fossil fuels have been obsolete for many decades, possibly longer. The authorities will not only have to deal with the liberating effect the availability of Free Energy will have on society, catastrophically-liberating from their point of view, but they'll also have to admit that they could have declassified it 100 or more years ago, and didn't for their own selfish reasons; to preserve their power over us. So every penny we've ever paid on gas and electricity bills, all the environmental destruction, all the poverty, all the people who've died of hunger in the Third World, all the wars for oil... it's all been for nothing! It was all preventable! There is no media scam that could spin them out of that one. We'd never trust them again and the Illuminati would have to kiss the New World Order goodbye, something they'd never do. In fact they'd pull a Gotterdammerung and destroy themselves, us and the whole planet Earth before they'd throw in the towel on the NWO.
There's also the effect that the acceptence of Extraterrestrial civlization would have on us psychologically, culturally and socially. Based on their track record for covering things up in space the Illuminati obviously need us to believe we're a tiny, lonely oasis of life and intelligence in an infinite cosmic desert of inanimate matter. It's clearly part of their psychological scheme.
The article reckons President Obama is going to go for Disclosure any day now; the most likely time will be when he accepts the Nobel Prize he's just been awarded for all the things he (hasn't) done on the 10th of December, in just two weeks from the time of writing. Well if Obama has any such intentions then he needs to avoid driving past any school book depositories! Seriously, he could well meet with a sudden accident or fatal illness between now and then; mark my words.
I mean, honestly! What do you think is going to happen? Are we going to turn on our TV one evening and and have it just declared?
"And in other news today: The government has just announced that UFO's are real, aliens are real, and they've known about it for 50 to 100 years, but they decided not to tell us until today... and now here's Michael Fish with the weather."
I don't think so.
Disclosure will happen, one day. It will be forced from their clutches by the people, and not given willingly under any circumstances or incentive. What's more, it can only happen as part of a far wider and more revolutionary global change in human society that will occur during the endgame between us and the Illuminati... But just in case I'm wrong (Yes, it does happen occasionally!) keep your eyes on the news. One thing's for certain: if Disclosure does happen in the near future you'll hear about it first, live and exclusive on HPANWO.
(HPANWO TV film about this subject: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2009/11/ufo-disclosure-coming-soon.html)
(Latest HPANWO Voice Story: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2009/11/ridley-scott-makes-common-purpose.html)
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
The Alternative View 3- Part 4
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
Alternative View 3- Part 3
Dr Mae Wan Ho
Organic Medicine- Shifting the Paradigm
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/index.php
Several times during the weekend, Ustane and I remarked to each other that the conference was developing a kind of narrative arc. Each speaker seemed to carry on from the one before them and also lay the ground for who was to come after. Dr Mae Wan Ho built on the theme that Trevor Gunn started and also was a good introduction to Leonid Sharashkin.
Mae is a very experienced biochemist from Hong Kong. Contrary to how Skeppers like to portray anti-GMO and natural health activists, she is highly qualified and a distinguished academic and has been for over 40 years. She began her lecture by announcing that the campaign against GM foods has won a major victory against Monsanto (See my review of the AV2 conference for background into this cut-throat company: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/alternative-view-ii-part-1.html) Its high-lysine GMO maize has been withdrawn. It’s been done quietly, I suspect to allow the company to save face. The same happened with the soft drink “Sunny D” a few years ago when they removed Aspartame from the drink’s ingredients. There is no HPANWO article, but I mentioned it on a forum at the time. (The natural health movement has won another major victory at about the same time as the conference was being held; Scott Tips, whose speech I review in the last AV report, has blocked a Codex Alimentarius proposal; here‘s a radio show about it: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2009/11nov/RIR-091113.php) For once the food standards agencies were doing their job; they asked for safety trial data and Monsanto couldn’t provide it.
Mae began by debunking what she believes is a dogma of genetics. The accepted idea that organisms emerge when DNA produces RNA that leads to proteins is not that simple. When you insert synthetic DNA into a genome it’s pretty much hit-and-miss. In one organism it can be harmless and yet in another it is deadly. It can do nothing at all, or it can produce cancer-causing substances, new viruses or violent allergic reactions. Synthetic DNA can mutate over many generations and also recombine “horizontally”, ie infect non-GM organisms that come into contact with it like some kind of plague… including humans who eat GM food. Genetics is far more complex than we think. It even seems that DNA has a memory; I’m reminded of Narby’s Cosmic Serpent. I remember how at the start of the Genome Project scientists were saying that they’d be able to build a human piece by piece at then end of it; well the Project has been completed, why can’t they? Mae believes that Monsanto’s GM maize, that has just been banned, has side-effects that include Alzheimer’s and Kidney problems. A German farmer fed this maize to his cattle once and every one of them died! Cows in India (a sacred animal in that country, so ask yourself what else is going on!) died after eating GM cotton stems. The debilitations caused by GM food can also be transmitted hereditarily; and Mae sites the same rat experiment as Susan Bardosz did at AV2, see link above. Monsanto are committing crimes against humanity. They want to destroy real science as we know it, and this reminded me of Arpad Pusztai’s lament about the end of the age of “Gentleman scientists”.
Mae then went on to state how she wished to teach Monsanto a lesson in genetics, to show them the “error of their ways”. Here I think Mae has not understood what is really going on. Monsanto and other organizations are not introducing GMO’s “by mistake”; they’re not being incompetent or lax etc. They’re doing it on purpose! She says: “When they pour ‘tolerated releases’ of GMO down the drain it’s as if they want to create a bio weapon”; well that’s because they do, Mae! It’s an malicious and deliberate act of eco-vandalism. Their motive? Well Ian R Crane’s lecture will give us a clue later in the AV3 narrative arc.
Mae, like Trevor, believes that we need a new kind of medicine. Genes are part of a “Molecular Dance of Life” or “Quantum Jazz” that has evolved over millions of years. (Mae has a way with words that was matched only by Anthony Hilder!) Alien material injected into the genes throws the dancers out of rhythm. This is why she says we have to ban GMO’s now and keep them out of the environment.
Mae then went onto discuss the Age of the Enlightenment in a way few people do, from outside; as a historical phenomenon itself rather than as the ultimate cognitive peak from which all others can be assessed. Descartes and Newton etc did humanity a great service by freeing us from superstitious religion, but it was lapped up so eagerly that we became gorged on it. This problem is put very well by the philosopher Brian Goodwin: “Not only the world was reduced to mechanism, we were reduced to mechanism too. The enlightenment caused a split between what was physical and therefore seen as real, and the non-physical: the immeasurable, the intangible; this was seen as unreal, epiphenomenal. The thing is that we live our lives primarily in that unreal world; the things that we value most are our feelings our consciousness our relationships with others. To have those denied is to enter into a serious pathology, and it needs to be healed. I don’t want to discard reductionism, I don’t want us to lose anything of value; all I want is to expand Western culture in a way that allows it to heal these pathologies generated by its own limitations.” I think Mae’s ideas may well be exactly what Goodwin has in mind. She wishes us to see the world holistically rather than something to be autopsied and each module studied separately. This is where I think she acts as an introduction to the next speaker. She begins to discuss her “Dream Farm”, a farm which is totally eco-friendly. It is carbon-neutral (not that carbon emissions are a concern of mine) and recycles all its waste including human toilet matter; something which is already being done in her native China. Why do we regularly flush such a wonderful natural fertilizer down the toilet every day, as Deek Jackson said in one of his FKN NEWZ shows: “We push a button and the shit disappears”. Unfortunately Mae didn’t have time to completely describe the Dream Farm, but it is something I’ll look up online for sure. I was particularly impressed when she said that these farms would best be run by Workers’ Cooperatives, companies in which everyone who works there is also an equal shareholder. This is something I’ve written about a lot myself before; see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2007/09/workers-cooperatives.html . The dream farm can be vegetarian and vegan as well as one with livestock. It’s a big subject, but I think it deserves a lot of airtime because it could solve the poverty and overpopulation problems in the post-Illuminati world.
Leonid Sharashkin
The Return of Anastasia- The Ringing Cedars’ Silent Revolution
http://www.ringingcedars.co.uk/
The 9-book series entitled The Ringing Cedars of Russia are a literary phenomenon which has taken the world by storm. They have been published and marketed in ways which breaks every rule in the business; they were not advertised, more than one book was published per year, and yet it has worked. They’ve sold over 10 million copies and have been translated into 20 languages. People are reporting that these books have changed their lives in every way. One Australian reader loved the first book, Anastasia, so much that he told Nexus magazine that “they make every other book I’ve ever read look like a waste of paper”.
Leonid was first given a copy of Anastasia by his mum as a present. It wasn’t available in regular bookshops and could only be bought online or from one warehouse where people were buying them in boxloads to give them out as presents to their family and friends. It was several years until Leonid got round to reading it (I know the feeling!) The author’s name was Vladimir Megre, and in Russian the main character of the popular Georges Simonon detective stories, Maigret, is basically-pronounced and spelt the same. The cover has a picture of a blonde girl on it called Anastasia, hence the title. This is a very common girl’s name in Russia. Then Leonid’s wife gave him a copy of the same book! So he thought he’s better start reading. By that time Vladimir Megre had written two more books and so Leonid got them too. I myself first got Anastasia after reading about it in Nexus magazine (see links column) and I’ve read them all except the last one. The story begins in 1994. Vladimir Megre was a successful businessman, a rouble millionaire living an enviable lifestyle with luxury, status and respect; a role-model for the post-Soviet Russian man. Then one day he hired a ship and went on a cruise down the River Ob, one of the world’s longest rivers that runs though the heart of the Siberian forest, known as the Taiga. The purpose of the cruise was to see if he could trade in cedar nut oil with the local people. There he met a remarkable old man who told him about how the cedar trees make a ringing sound when they reach a certain age; when they do that they must be felled. If they are then their wood contains special properties that cannot be found in a tree felled before or after its ringing period. While he was in port at the Siberian village where he landed he held a party on board his ship and a young woman was one of the people who came along, although at the time he didn’t know who she was or the importance she would play in his life. The following year Megre returned to the village and was met on the jetty by a young woman with blonde hair who wanted to show him something. She led him into the woods where she took off her overcoat, boots and shawl and walked clean and free in a short white dress; her name was Anastasia and she was the granddaughter of the man he'd met the previous year. He spent just a few days with her at her home deep in the forest, but it was a a few days that turned his life upside down. He left the Taiga and went back to his home in Novosibirsk and decided he would write a book about his experiences with Anastasia. He jacked in his business, laid off all his staff and sold his house. He rented an office with a computer, a desk and a mattress on the floor for him to sleep on and he lived there instead. The books are impossible to describe, but they’re basically Anastasia’s philosophy and observations on life which are clearly part of a lost stream of indigenous wisdom that is almost unheard of today, thanks to the genocidal actions of the Illuminati through its subsidiaries: the Inquisition, the Conquistadors etc. She speaks of farming, child-rearing, parenthood, education, sexuality and much more. The centrepiece of her ideas is that of the “Kin’s Domain”, Russia has a great tradition in smallholder organic agriculture and gardening and there’s an ancient law that says every Russian citizen is entitled to their Dacha, one hectare of land in the countryside, a kind of free allotment. Most people use their Dacha to build a second home on, usually to rent out, but Dachas have saved lives. Russia has been through several periods of famine, even recently in the immediate post-Soviet chaos of the early 1990’s, and people have often survived by moving onto their Dacha and growing their own food. There is a “Dachnik Day”, the 23rd of July.
For Anastasia the Kin’s Domain is far more than just a garden; it’s a sacred living temple where man and nature can become one and coexist in the “Space of Love”. You really have to read the books to know what I’m talking about, but beware! You might end up like Leonid and his family! Leonid showed a picture of himself and his wife when they were at a school of economics; they’re dressed in suits with neat hair and a Conformist mien. Then there’s another photo of them standing outside their farmhouse on their Kin’s Domain looking like hippies from the 1960’s! They set up their Dacha east of Moscow and today they live a life that was inspired in every way by The Ringing Cedars books. They have a daughter called Lada, which you might think is the name of a substandard make of car, but it was originally a Russian pagan goddess. Leonid started asking why the world has not heard of Russia’s indigenous spiritual tradition, as Edgar Cayce said: “From Russia comes hope.” Leonid by that time had become an English translator and wanted badly to translate the books into English. The original translation was done by a well-meaning but incompetent woman who had learned just basic English at school and used a pharsebook, not good enough. In fact Russian-English translations are usually bad and you’d only appreciate this if you spoke both languages and compared, say, the English edition of War and Peace with its original text by Leo Tolstoy. Leonid wrote to Megre asking if he could translate the book into English saying that he wanted to put the emotional spirit into the book that is so often lacking in other translations. He sold his precious collection of Russian woodcarvings to provide funds and got together with another Russian translator in Canada called John Wordsworth and the English Ringing Cedars books soon appeared and this was when I read them. Like Mae, Leonid doesn’t talk of conspiracies, but he still echoes much of my own thought on how the authorities keep control of the masses. Leonid quotes Albert Schweitzer: “Self-sufficiency and a direct human-nature relationship is the ultimate freedom”. And conversely breaking that relationship is the key to human control. We see that today in the way we depend on shops and the money system to obtain everything we need and the confiscation of land is the first thing any tyrannical invader does. We see all that going on today in this country. Who actually owns land in Britain apart from the government, corporations or the Church? Very few people indeed, there has never been the equivalent of a Dacha Law in Britain, even in an age when the population density would have made it possible. Transnational collectives are buying up farms, rural communities are breaking down and people are being cajoled into getting 9-to-5 jobs in the cities. I remember as a child watching a comedy show called The Good Life (http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/goodlife/index.shtml) which is all about a young couple, played by Richard Briers and Felicity Kendal, who decide to opt out of the system and become self-sufficient, feeding themselves from a farm they set up in their back garden. I might watch this series again for the ideas presented about off-grid life, but unfortunately, although I remember laughing like a drain when I saw it as a little child, I don’t find it very funny now.
Religion is another method the Elite have used to control us. They use the fear of death as a weapon against us, promising people a ticket to Heaven and escape from Hell and Damnation so long as you serve the church and revere the priest, even to the point where you let him abuse your children. The church in Russia behaved exactly as it did in other parts of the world, building churches of pagan sacred sites and exterminating Shamans. The survivors fled into the Taiga and Leonid believes that Anastasia is a descendent of these refugees. Anastasia calls her own culture “Vedruss” and her mission is to bring back the lost knowledge of her people to the modern world. Her ideas are catching on, and not just in Russia. Americans are digging up their lawns and planting their Kin’s Domains. And even people who don’t have gardens are doing it. One man lives in a small flat in Brooklyn, New York and his lounge is like a jungle there are so many plants in it! You don’t have to go completely native and give up everything in your existing lives; there are people who adopt Anastasia’s ideas in lesser degrees.
I enjoyed the books a lot, although I wouldn’t speak as enthusiastically about them as some of the other exuberant reviewers have. They’ve not changed my life to the extent they have Leonid’s and many other people’s. I also doubt if Megre is portraying Anastasia as she literally is. In the books she resembles a nymph, prancing around naked while squirrels and sparrows carry food to put in her mouth. She sleeps in a cave next to a huge she-bear which helps her look after her 2 year-old child! This seems rather unlikely. Also Anastasia has never met with any representative of the media, there are no known photographs of her and nobody other than Megre claims to have seen her. But I dismiss those who claim Megre is simply making her up. Why would he? To make money? Hardly! He was already a rouble millionaire and by writing the books he ended up virtually penniless; it was the ultimate riches-to-rags story. I think Anastasia is real and Megre is relating her words accurately, but she probably lives in some remote Siberian village, eating off her Dacha. Megre’s embellishment of the story may seem a bit corny, but it has the added effect of preserving Anastasia’s anonymity which could be one of the reasons he did it. But the important thing is that the books deliver very progressive ideas that inspire and motivate lots of people and the world needs that.
Greg Nikolettos
The Human Microchipping Agenda- Hypnotized into the Mainframe by the Science of Gradualism
http://www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com/
Greg Nikolettos hails from Australia’s huge Greek community and at first glance looks rather like the comedian David Baddiel. He uses satire to present his ideas and when this advert came out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDhDrFrs7as , he produced his own parody in response: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ5h73CFGJw . I’ve written a lot about human microchipping and its dangers like here: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/09/michael-dimercurio-and-kevin-warwick.html and: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/06/ai-and-new-human.html . The government are currently using fear to promote the chip, explaining how it can make it easier for doctors to treat you if you’re in hospital. Some people have also been chipped to protect them from terrorists, God knows how they think that works! But it’s an example of the tactics governments use in their relationship to the people. They also use positive images too, showing how convenient it is to be chipped, with images of healthy young party-goers skipping the queues in nightclubs and children playing happily in a park, safe from getting lost because of their chip. The chippers also use the gradualism that Greg talks about by targeting certain groups for chipping; and presenting each targeting campaign both as independent from all the others and in the public interest. In Britain they’re talking about microchipping soldiers so that they can be traced if they get lost behind enemy lines. Probationers might also be chipped to keep an eye on where they are, and the news has recently been flooded with stories of crimes committed by prisoners while on probation to get the public behind the scheme. I suspect that the current media obsession with asylum-seekers is going to be used in the same way. The thing is, if we keep supporting chipping schemes for various groups of people of which we are not a part, a time is going to come when so many of these “other people” are chipped that the chippers will throw their hands in the air and say: “Oh well, we might as well just do everybody else now”… and that is the whole idea! Anybody who says: “Damn immigrants/homeless people/criminals/unemployed/hooligans etc! They deserve it! And it’s only them; it doesn’t effect us.” are forging their own shackles, and everybody else’s. As Pastor Neimoller said: “First the came for the Jews…”
To understand this subject it’s important to realize how advanced modern electronics is. IBM is the central player in this game and they have virtually back-engineered the human brain. In fact synchronistically I saw the cover of Focus magazine (I used to subscribe; forgive me, I'm not proud of it!), this one: http://www.bbcfocusmagazine.com/issue/ithink , all about the subject. Yes, we could soon have a computer that can match the human brain, being conscious, able to think independently and effectively be alive! It’s been long predicted by sci-fi, and now AI is here. There are some people who say that once a computer has been created that can reproduce the capabilities of the human brain then the very definition of what it means to be human will change. A human body and brain will simply be another computer. IBM actually have plans to “mesh” a human brain to a neural net, an artificial brain, like the “carbon computers” in Michael DiMercurio’s books, see the link above. Internet sites like Facebook and Twitter are a stage towards that, but this doesn’t put Greg off having his own FB group, which I’ve joined. As I related above, Ustane and I had a conversation with a taxi driver on this very subject just before leaving for the conference; that IP addresses will be issued to people, computer users rather than the computers themselves. Forget wi-fi, the computer/human brain will become wireless and our thoughts will be just software!
The whole school of thought that human beings will one day be replaced with, and indeed become, intelligent machines is known collectively as “Transhumanism”. It is a part scientific-part religious notion of a technological utopia. Some visions have a Gotterdammerung streak, the destruction of the world in a “Grey Goo” Armageddon. A mind held in a biological brain is just a fragile stepping-stone to a eugenics apogee that makes the Nazis look like fluffy bunnies. The media, as usual, has caught on with films like The Matrix, Stepford Wives and Demolition Man.
Greg compares chipping to branding. Branding has always had connotations of tyranny. Slaves were branded, concentration camp prisoners etc. Like Nathan Sarea at Probe (see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/04/probe-conference-march-2009.html) Greg supports the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which includes the right to privacy; chipping totally contravenes that. All tyrannical regimes have created databases for their citizens, even in the era before electronics; like the Nazis: “Pappieren bitte!” (snaps fingers). But the massive advancement of electronics in recent years makes the situation far more dangerous because the potential for the abuse of this technology is enormous. Greg rejects the idea that there are chips in vaccines, but I disagree. Secret technology is always decades ahead of publicly-available technology so what Focus is saying might be done in the next ten years has in fact already been done 20 or 30 years ago in the secret underground bases. Greg thinks that “useful idiots” like the Jacobs family are how the government are going to get the chips into people. The Jacobs’ have been in TV adverts etc to make chips look “cool”. Recently an MP announced proudly that he was the first politician ever to get chipped. I doubt that! But he is definitely the first who has announced it on a public stand.
Imagine a world where as you enter a restaurant a scanner picks up your chip and identifies you, then scales under the floor weigh you and if you’re above the obesity threshold the price of chips automatically goes up. You mistakenly throw a Starbucks coffee cup into a landfill bin instead of a recycling box and the chip in the cup and the one in your body trigger a relay that instantly deducts a fine from your bank account. You walk into a life insurance company’s office and a reader on the door checks your medical records before you reach the waiting room.
Can this be true? How close are we to it if it is? The answer is yes and very. This is the Illuminati’s dream: total mental slavery; the New World Order will be electronic. Things like mind-reading PET scanners are already developed and some are being trialled at airports to pick out anyone who might be thinking about planting a bomb. But as always it’s not over yet. At the moment we still have our free will. We can stop this agenda, but to do so we have to refuse to cooperate, not only refuse to be chipped, but refuse to go onto any databases of any kind because these non-chip databases will be adapted into the chip ones. We must say no to the National Identity Card, biometric passports and driving licenses. We must refuse to allow our children to be fingerprinted and police or medical staff to store our DNA. We must decline shop loyalty cards and travel saver-cards (see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/big-brother-is-paying-you.html). It might cost us a few more pence, but what price is our freedom. If we assert our free will then the Transhumanist nightmare will be derailed.
Saturday Evening
We had a lovely evening watching Gareth Icke and Deek Jackson. I caught up with “Dr Hemp” and “Half Moon” from the David Icke Forum. But we were so tired we had to head off back to the flat by midnight.
(Go back to Part 2: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-2.html
Go on to Part 4: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-4.html)
Sunday, 22 November 2009
Alternative View 3- Part 2
The alarm clock went off at 7AM and Ustane and I stirred from our sleep that was too deep and too short. We both had nightmares. Ustane’s was an awful one about children having their limbs cut off. It really disturbed her. After hearing Brian Gerrish first thing we wondered if her dream was prophetic. My nightmare was something I’d rather not reveal right now, but it has fortunately proven not to be prophetic; I‘ll let you know if it is.
Brian Gerrish
Child-Stealing by the State
http://www.cpexposed.com/
Here’s my review of Brian’s speech at the AV2 Conference: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/alternative-view-ii-part-5.html . A lot has happened in Brian’s life since he addressed AV2 in June. His newspaper, The UK Column (http://www.ukcolumn.org/) has been served an injunction to stop it reporting on what is going on in secret family courts. This is very disturbing new information for all of us, and gives me a real chill because I very nearly had my child made a ward-of-the-state myself in 2005; I only escaped this fate by suing my own mother and agreeing to live in the same house as my ex-partner; it was a harrowing period of my life. The state is using clandestine actions to bully, threaten and frame parents. They falsify evidence, like medical records and assessments and this is getting so bad that they can remove the children of almost anyone they choose at will. Why is the state doing this? To break up families and raise the next generation of citizens under their own direct control. Children in this country, not some tin-pot dictatorship, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, can be snatched from loving and competent parents and imprisoned in state communal homes where nobody can visit them. There they are being sexually abused and subjected to medical experiments without parental consent. If they die while in “care” they have their organs snatched for the Transplant Service. Maybe this is where Ustane’s dream comes from; it is also very synchronous when you consider the news story I mentioned from Australia and Kevin Annett‘s work in Canada; these projects are nothing new. Parents who try to investigate and get their kids back are stonewalled. There was actually a news story a few weeks ago about a 17 year old girl with a newborn baby who has gone on the run to escape Social Services. They say she is “not bright enough to be a mother”. This is par-for-the-course in actions like these because they basically said the same thing about me in 2005! If I’d known then what I know now I’d have gone on the run too. Social Services are a law unto themselves who are not accountable to the elected representatives who employ them. Any councillors who try to investigate them have their careers threatened by “scrutiny committees”; and you can get a politician to run naked through Sainsburys with a cucumber up their arse by threatening their career!
Brian states that he believes that the suicide hotspots in South Wales and other places are not just statistical blips; they are not, to use that cliché cop-out, a coincidence. One anomaly is that most of the victims are teenage girls and they carry out the tragic act by hanging themselves. This does not match the normal habits of their age-group; most teenage girls take drug or medication overdoses.
One motive for this crime by the state is money. At a lower level the state can buy cooperation by rewarding lawyers, doctors and social workers with cash bonuses for their work. I’ve always thought that at a higher level there’s a far more long-term strategic agenda in play, and Brian agrees. The real motive for what he talks about is the creation of a new kind of society; in other words a New World Order. These various organizations involved are controlled by a central organizing cadre made up of elite psychological manipulation think-tanks like Common Purpose and the Tavistock Institute. I’ve written a lot about this myself as you’ll see if you browse around HPANWO. Local authority figures who have been targeted for this kind of treatment often display psychopathic behaviour and these are exactly the kind of people the Elite want ruling us. It’s in line with what is written in the Communist Manifesto and Frankfurt School about breaking down family bonds and replacing them with the state as a father/mother-figure. I have a lot of admiration for Brian, the way he is researching and exposing these evils. What’s more I sense that he is becoming more and more aware of the “bigger picture” that I said in my last conference report that he hadn’t yet grasped. Brian delivers the hard-hitting facts-of-life, but he is not a doom-and-gloom merchant like Alan Watt and some other people I could mention. He remains optimistic and truly believes that if we expose this agenda we can get out of this cess-pit and build a brighter future. He recommends a book called Forced Adoption by Ian Josephs (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Forced-Adoption-2nd-Ed-Josephs/dp/140926971X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1258731056&sr=1-1)
Norman Baker MP
The Strange Death of David Kelly
http://www.normanbaker.org.uk/
The sudden and mysterious death of the government weapons inspector Dr David Kelly happened not far from where I live. In fact the first I heard about it was from the ambulance service crews at my hospital. I know Dave Bartlett, the paramedic who actually attended the scene and I’ve personally commended him for speaking out about his own suspicions in the media. You can see him speaking on this programme: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3255138464276514819&ei=WrgGS_rlKJPQ-AaYw9CHCg&q=dr+david+kelly+conspiracy# . Like Cynthia McKinney, Norman Baker is another member of that rare breed of politician who is not scared to ruffle feathers and rattle cages. Since he was elected to Parliament by the people of Lewes, Sussex in 1997 he has developed a reputation for being a very persistent interrogator. In fact he won awards for it like Zurich-Spectator Inquisitor of the Year. He is behind the recent expose that caused the MP’s expenses scandal; which is commendable from his point of view, although through no fault of his, the media exploited it as a diversion from the EU Elections. In 2006 he stepped down from the Liberal Democrats Shadow Cabinet to concentrate full time on the David Kelly affair. I wonder if he was asking himself if he should jump before he was pushed! It’s impossible to understand the David Kelly Affair without seeing it in the context of the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Norman calls it a “disgrace to democracy”. For instance Tony Blair said that he only knew that the invasion would definitely take place 3 months before it happened when “C” at MI6 has admitted that the decision to invade was made by President Bush much earlier and that the WMD and terrorism excuse was fitted in around that decision retrospectively. This was the motivation behind the creation of the “dodgy” and “sexed-up” dossiers. Blair then went on to make announcements in Parliament that Iraq had the capability to wipe out Britain with nuclear missiles in 5 minutes; the ever-obliging tabloid media backed him up with pictures of stopwatches and mushroom clouds. It’s beyond satire that Blair is now a Middle East peace envoy! The shark is well and truly in charge of the swimming pool!The affair ended with Lord Hutton’s enquiry in which the government came up smelling of roses and the BBC were demonized. This caused wildcat strikes at the Corporation resulting in the permanent resignations of many of its senior staff. Norman describes it as looking like the Prague Spring. Nobody in government resigned or was indicted in any way. Lord Hutton, a member of the Inner Temple legal secret society who was very speedily appointed to office (Norman says the selection process took place on an airline flight!), and his successors have never questioned the pathology reports on David Kelly and it was only later that Dave Bartlett’s testimony was brought to bear and question marks began appearing over whether Kelly really did commit suicide. Norman went on to write a book on the subject that was for sale on the conference stalls (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Strange-Death-David-Kelly/dp/1842752170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1258736944&sr=1-1) Dr David Kelly was one of the Iraq weapons inspectors sent into the country to assess Saddam Hussein’s nuclear, biological and chemical warfare capability; which is one of the greatest paradoxes in politics because everyone involved knew damn well that Iraq didn’t have one. It would be laughable in happier circumstances! What happened was that Blair and Jeff Hoon, his Defence Secretary, decided to use Kelly as a pawn in their conflict with the BBC. They conspired to leak his name to the press. The official explanation is that when Kelly was grilled by a Parliamentary investigation committee he couldn’t take the heat so he went out into a forest near his home and took his own life. Those like Norman who question this explanation do so for the following reasons: On the day of his death he saw many of his friends in his home, the close-knit village of Southmoor, Oxfordshire. They describe him as being in good spirits and don’t recall sensing anything wrong with his mood. Kelly was actually a fairly tough and resilient man; he’d have to be in his job. He had been a weapons inspector for many years and had faced down dictators and generals with electric batons and flaying knifes tucked into their belts. He wasn’t the kind of person who’d be intimidated by, if you’ll excuse me, a bunch of poofs in suits. He also had strong personal motivations to live; his wife was ill and his daughter was about to get married. There are forensic anomalies too: the knife he supposedly used to slash his own wrists was very blunt; too blunt to have caused the incision; and the incision itself severed the ulna artery, not the more usual radial artery. This could not have caused him to bleed to death. This was backed up by Dave Bartlett’s testimony when he said that there was not much blood at the scene. Dave has been a paramedic even longer than I have been a Porter and has seen many slashers in his time; he’d immediately be alerted if he knew something was wrong. If Kelly really wanted to end it all there are more effective ways of doing it: shooting oneself, jumping in front of a train etc. Also his system contained less than half the lethal dose of coproximol from the tablets he was supposed to have downed. There was no coroners inquest, which is unheard of. The Oxfordshire coroner didn’t even handle the death; he was replaced by, wait for it... Lord Hutton himself! It reminds me of the confusion and distortion following the Kennedy Assassination where the Dallas and US Navy coroners’ reports were contradictory and kept getting lost etc. Norman compares it with the death of Dianna. Strange how history keeps repeating itself. Norman can only conclude that Dr Kelly was murdered. So who killed him and why? Norman said: “There is no obvious motive for the government to have been behind it”. This was because it caused so much grief for them; the enquiry etc, public scandal. But here Norman assumes that the government weren’t willing to trade in a greater evil for a lesser one. We don’t know what the consequences would have been if Kelly had been left alive. I’ve a feeling that there is another factor involved; and we know that the Iraq invasion had to happen, at any cost. No number of hoops were too many to jump through. What if Kelly had something on the government that might have stopped the war? Government’s take risks; sometimes their gambles pay off, as in the moon landings and 9/11, but at other times they do cock-up, as in the Iran-Contra Scandal and Watergate etc. I was a bit exasperated that Norman didn’t actually tell us who he thinks did it but referred us to his book for more details. This ensured him a few extra sales I’m sure! We are naïve if we think for a second that governments don’t commit murder for political reasons. They all have done so, throughout all history. If they don’t nowadays then it’s the first time ever! Many years ago I read a book called The Nemesis File by Paul Bruce. The author used to be in the SAS and in the late 1960’s he joined a secret execution squad in Northern Ireland. Bruce tells us exactly where he and his accomplices buried the bodies and challenges the government to dig them up and charge him with murder! This book was banned soon after I bought my copy, but it now back in a new edition: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nemesis-File-Story-Execution-Squad/dp/185782167X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1258738728&sr=1-1 . Experience tells us it pays to never underestimate the government’s ability to deceive. In fact I have doubts over the resignation of Charles Kennedy as leader of Norman’s party, the Liberal Democrats. He just called a press conference one day to announce before the nation that he was an alcoholic and that he was quitting. This was without the usual scoop by The Sun with a headline like “LIBERAL BOOZE-O-CRAT” or "THIRD PARTY ANIMAL" including a front page photo of him reeling home from a pub or something. I think he was told to quit by “Men in Grey Suits” and this supposed drink problem was a made-up excuse. Maybe he was making his party too popular, to the point where they might actually be elected, so they put in Menzies Campbell to knock them back down to size. I think Norman was being a bit too cagy over “who-dunnit” during his speech, but despite that I’ve still got a lot of respect for him. Let’s hope the truth comes out one day and Dr David Kelly’s face the justice that they deserve.
Trevor Gunn
Vaccination- The Evidence and Alternative Ways of Looking at Health.
http://www.informedparent.com/
I want to see this man debate Ben Goldacre! I want to see a “useful idiot” finally put in his place! See: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/03/bad-science-by-ben-goldacre_25.html . In fact as I say in the linked article, it’s strange how Goldy always picks on the most famous but least credible members of the alternative health movement. Why doesn’t he mention people like Trevor, but targets lightweights like Gillian McKeith.
Trevor used to be a biochemist, but then became interested in homeopathy; today he treats people using this method and is exploring the most basic and fundamental theories of modern medicine and asking if they stand up to scrutiny, or are just held up by a scaffolding of dogma. Despite the claims of people like Goldy there is no evidence that vaccinations contributed to the conquest of the diseases that used to plaque humanity. Trials are actually biased in many ways. They ignore graphs that show how many illnesses like smallpox, diphtheria and others were already in sharp decline long before their respective vaccine was introduced. Even worse, vaccines were harmful; well this is no surprise to me and I’ve written a lot on this subject; eg, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2009/11/jabbers.html . A Dr Kalokerina was the first to notice that Australian children who’d had the whooping cough vaccine often fell ill; some died. Malnourished kids were worst effected. He described it as “genocide”. But despite all this, conventional medical scientists still insist that vaccines are safe. (At the time of writing the GMTV doctor Dr Hillary Jones has been on telling the public that there’s nothing to fear from the H1N1 jab and that everyone should have it done.) Why can’t we be more sure? As I said in my writings about Goldy, surely science should be able to clear this controversy up one way or then other. But Trevor thinks that there are political and sociological reasons why the public perception that vaccinations work is vital; it’s not just about money and Big Pharma’s profit. Questions about vaccines could start a “domino effect” that could bring down the entire medical paradigm and progress tower. This paradigm originates from Louis Pasteur who was the victor in a battle that took place in the mid 19th Century between two proto-medical schools of thought. Pasteur won; hense he is famous. There's a statue of him in Paris and dozens of universities, hospitals and other scientific institutions are named after him. In 1995 the World Health Organization proclaimed that it would be a "Year of Pasteur" because it was the centenery of his death. He also gave his name to the process called "Pasteurization", boiling milk as soon as it comes out of the cow to kill all the "nasty germs" in it. Unfortunately this also destroys 90% of its nutrients too. What's wrong with just just bottling milk and refrigerating it instead? After all we're not forced to boil eggs as soon as they are laid are we? But Pasteur's "Germ Theory" stuck in the end. It stated that illness is caused by exposure to harmful foreign microbes that are not normally present in the body; hense the need to boil the milk. The man Pasteur vanquished is Antoine Bechamps, a name you'll never hear in education and he has nowhere named after him. His view was very different. Bechamps said that that our bodies are not “invaded” by malevolent alien microbes; these microbes are present in our bodies anyway, but they're not usually harmful. It is that something in our environment, either external or internal, changes that makes these existing microbes become pathogenic. This theory was abandoned after Pasteur's elevation to scientific sainthood, but Trevor thinks that it needs to be dusted off and reexamined. There are more microbes in our body than cells. Our bodies are not pure in their sterile form, but are in fact ecosystems. People put in a completely sterile environment often become very ill due to autoimmune reactions. All patients on antibiotics get stomach ache because the carpet-bombing effect of the drug kills our symbiotic gut bacteria. I suffered from autoimmune eczema myself during my 6 years as a Theatre Porter when I served in the ultra-clean operating theatres at my hospital. One of the reasons for Pasteur prevailing over Bechamps was that Pasteur's theory appealed to our need to find a cop-out so that we wouldn’t have to deal with the social concerns of the time. The Industrial Revolution was spreading across Europe and people were pouring into rapidly expanding cities. They lived in uncomfortable, overcrowded housing in sqalid, crime-ridden slum districts; they drank dirty water, ate bad food, were overworked and subjected to humiliation and violence. As a result they became ill. Pasteur allowed people to ignore all that and say: “It’s OK, there’s nothing wrong with our society and we don‘t need to improve it, it’s just that these poor people are the victims of attacks by hostile germs.” The cholera phenomenon was a good example. Medics constantly pat themselves on the back when you mention cholera and congratulate themselves for saving people from it. In fact the man who saved people from cholera was not a doctor, he was a civil engineer called Joseph Bazalgette. He invented the London sewage system that gave the people clean water and allowed them to dispose of their toilet matter hygienically; his system was so effective that it’s still in use in London today and has become the model for sewers in virtually every city in the world. We need a renaissance for Bechamps. We need to go back to basics and reinvestigate the entire Pasteur-Bechamps controversy and if that means scratching 160 years of laboratory labour then so be it. This could break the impasse and solve the mysteries about how our immune systems work. For instance, there’s this confusion over how antibody levels in the bloodstream are not always proportional to our level of immunity. We mustn’t tolerate media distortion over the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. The same goes for inexcusable jading in scientific trials. For instance in one experiment the control group of supposedly non-vaccinated subjects were made up of people who had in fact had the vaccine but had not had a good antibody response! The body count of vaccination is a Holocaust! Trevor has a holistic view of medicine. The different organs and systems of the body should not be treated as independent “modules”, but should instead be seen as parts of a whole, in which the function of each part effects the others; this is like the “Holographic Principle” that David Icke talks about. Symptoms like bacterial infections are actually an effect, not a cause of disease. If you suppress symptoms like diarrhoea, vomiting or fever with drugs this can be harmful because those symptoms are reactions that can protect the body from damage. This is like telling somebody not to weep when they’re sad, and psychologists all agree that this is very harmful. I enjoyed Trevor’s lecture enormously. Like I said, he is a less well-known critic of the medical establishment, so why don’t its gatekeepers engage him? It’s probably because they simply can’t. So they just ignore him and write books about how bad Trevor’s more famous pale imitators are in the hope that the public will simply read that and be put off investigating anything else that contradicts the prevailing paradigm. It’s an old trick.
(Go back to Part 1: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-1.html
Go on to Part 3: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-3.html)
(Latest HPANWO Voice story: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2009/11/ufo-disclosure-immient.html)
Thursday, 19 November 2009
Alternative View 3- Part 1
(Here’s Ustane’s own report of the AV3 Conference: http://spreadingtheword-now.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view.html
And here‘s my report of the previous AV2 Conference in June at Heathrow Airport, London: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/alternative-view-ii-part-1.html
I‘ve also done a brief HPANWO TV reportage of AV3: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view-3.html)
Here's AV3's website: http://avlll.co.uk/
I’ve recently started comparing places to people. If you remember from my previous reports I’ve described Liverpool as having a grandeur that was “more feminine” than London’s. Bristol is different from both of them; I’d say that it’s an old man, not very old, just in his early 60’s. He’s not really likeable or approachable, but he’s quite interesting and charismatic; a unique man with interesting tales to tell. He smokes roll-ups and wears a quasi-nautical garb with a reefer and peaked cap. Liverpool, conversely, is a young woman, no older that 35. She’s pretty and bright-eyed with a warm voice. She’s funny and lively, but also a bit sad, as if she’s suffered badly and witnessed the suffering of others. She has permed blonde hair and dresses in jeans and a thin zip-up jacket. But let’s go back to Bristol because he is the old man at the centre of this particular story.
I was in Bristol last weekend to attend the Alternative View 3 Conference, third in the successful AV series founded by my friend and fellow researcher Ian R Crane. I was very pleased and surprised that Ian organized another AV conference so soon after the last one in June. I always planned to attend but I assumed it would be an annual event; but as Ian said in one of his radio interviews, things are moving so fast. I agree; maybe once a year is not enough. The event has really taken off and this time Ian even managed to get an ad for it in the satirical politics magazine Private Eye. As I said at the last conference, the esoteric is becoming the new mainstream. As usual I was accompanied by Ustane. I’ve never really waxed lyrical about Ustane on HPANWO before but perhaps I should. I find it hard to describe her because I’ve never known anyone quite like her or regarded anyone in the same way. I met her last year at the anti-New World Order protest in London (See: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2008/09/anti-new-world-order-protest-2908.html) and we got on very well together from the start. The strange thing was, I wasn’t looking for a girlfriend at the time; in fact I’d completely given up! A year or two earlier I’d come to terms with the fact that I was destined to be single for life and had even begun to rather enjoy it! I relished being able to sleep in late, neglecting my personal hygiene and boozing it up cheaply on my own at home. Then out of the blue, Ustane emerges in my life and has merged seamlessly with who I was before but, uniquely in my relationships, she doesn’t displace a single part of what I was before. Being together with her just feels so… natural. I'm not one of these people who have past-life memories, but I’d love to know if I have encountered her before my birth in this world. People keep asking me: “Is it true love, Ben?” My answer to that question is: “If you mean do I love her, then most definitely yes.” But am I in love with Ustane in the same way I have been with other girls in the past. No. Maybe that’s a good thing; "In love" seems to me a bit of a primitive and immature emotion these days.
Our journey to the conference began with a lot of energy. The evening before we’d been to the cinema to see The Fourth Kind, and I’ve made a HPANWO TV film review of it here: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2009/11/fourth-kind.html . You can see why our heads were spinning a bit! We also had a very interesting conversation with a taxi-driver before the film. He was a young Nigerian man who was also a student of electronic engineering and IT. He was very concerned about the dangers of the new “IP6” which would give people IP addresses instead of computers themselves. This chimed in nicely to Greg Nikolettos’ speech two days later. We changed at Didcot Parkway for the Western Express and while sitting in the waiting room a man came up to me and said: “Hey, are you that bloke on YouTube? The one who talks about conspiracies and stuff like that?” My God, am I’m getting famous? I don’t really want to be; my desire is to see the world free, not to achieve personal success and accolade. I must also have one of these faces that nobody ever forgets; whether that’s in a good way or a bad way. The man’s name was Nick and he was getting the same train as us, so we sat together and continued our conversation. He’s a very interesting guy who has founded a discussion group. Luckily he lives in Oxford too so he’s invited me to join. Another member is quite a well-known horror-story writer who has started his own blog; he has already been in touch and wanted to meet up with me for a chat. It’s a good bit of synchro that we just so happened to bump into a mutual acquaintance. It’s encouraging that many people who would in a pervious era have seemed extremely locked into the mainstream world are branching out and testing new waters just like everybody else. There are actually quite a large number of AV “satellite groups” emerging all over the country and beyond; there are discussion circles that I’ve heard of in Ireland and Sweden too.
Ustane and I stepped off the train and wormed our way through Brunel’s monastic edifice of Temple Meads Station to emerge onto a rainwashed and windlashed street. In fact the weather for the entire weekend was atrocious; gales and torrential rain prevailed. Still I’m not complaining. It could have been worse; we could have been going camping at a David Icke Forum meet-up again. Our hotel had put us up off-campus in a lovely compact-and-bijou self-catering flat just 20 minutes walk from the conference. However with the weather it felt like longer. Also the vertical dimensions of Bristol are extreme compared to both Oxford and Nottingham. The city is built into a series of steep, undulating hills and valleys, so travelling back up the slope from the conference to the hotel reminded me a bit of my school days, doing cross-country runs over Shotover, Oxford‘s highest hill. However on the way there it was the opposite; in fact if I’d had a bike I could have done the journey without pedalling.
The flat had a TV set and I woke up each morning by watching BBC News. As is often the case when I go away to events, there were some apt current affairs in progress. Firstly, the US government want to very publicly prosecute a motley crew of men with dark skin and beards; they also have sinister-sounding names like Mohammed Evil al-Turban or something. The reason is that they’re supposed to have carried out 9/11. This is palpable nonsense, but the US Attorney General interviewed on the programme is convinced he can “get the result he wanted”. A guilty verdict seemed an unspoken foregone conclusion by both himself and the BBC newsreader who addressed him. You can bet the media will be drooling over this as they did the OJ Simpson hearings. Who says you can’t have Trial by Television? Another story is the terrible case of a pressure group which is trying to get compensation for some elderly people in Australia who came to the country from Britain as children as part of a programme where they were sexually abused and forced into slave labour. It reminded me a bit of Kevin Annett’s mission in Canada, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/10/unrepentant-kevin-annett-and-canadas.html . It’s like what David Halpin said at the last Conference (see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/alternative-view-ii-part-5.html ) It’s deeply disquieting how easily the intolerable can be made tolerable.
Friday Evening
The Alternative View 3 Conference was held at the Grand Thistle Hotel and it was very nice there, but it was a little difficult to find our way around in its maze of identical corridors. The food looked and smelled delectable and more than once Ustane and I wished we were staying in. The auditorium was once again elegant and comfortable; a carpeted hall with a well-designed backdrop. I saw a few familiar faces at once, but there were also many new delegates there for the first time. I think I might be forming an "AV Family" a bit like myy Probe Family. The event was opened by a funny and likeable man called Alex who came onto the stage wearing an Ickeian turquoise suit. Like before, Edge Media TV were there and the master-of-ceremonies were Franky Ma and Theo Chalmers. Here I begin my review of the speakers. I’ve reproduced my interpretation of what they said to the best of my understanding. If any of them are reading this, or anybody else better-informed, and I’ve made some mistakes then I apologize.
Cynthia McKinney
911-Donald Rumsfeld-Palestine Part 1
http://www.allthingscynthiamckinney.com/
Cynthia McKinney is one of only two decent people I know of who have ever tried to get elected as President of the United States, the other being Ron Paul. No doubt her decency contributed to her failure, as it always does in politics. I’ll come back to that point when we discuss Norman Baker‘s speech. Like many black Americans who are interested in their cultural origins Cynthia was dressed in a shawl that looked African in style. She speaks loudly and passionately in a riverboat accent that comes straight out of her home in the Deep South. Her quest for justice and freedom began as a child when she went with her parents to support Dr Martin Luther King before he was shot dead by “another lone nut” in 1968. She was one of two two-part speakers of the conference and she used up most of her first session showing us videos. The first was a song by Desert Rose, Who Is Your God which shows scenes of war and famine. It has lyrics in several languages to illustrate common humanity, which exposes such atrocities into the pointless absurdities that they are. Cynthia’s mission has taken her around her own country and all over the world, to South Africa and Gaza. In fact she was on the ship Dignity with David Halpin when it was attacked by the Israeli navy in 2008, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/alternative-view-ii-part-5.html . Like David she was lucky to escape with her life, but it didn’t put her off. She very bravely embarked again to Gaza to protest and give relief to the victims of the attempted-genocide known as “Operation Small Axe”. What happened then she describes in the second part of her address on Sunday, see below.
Cynthia’s political career began when she was elected to the Georgia Legislature. She immediately encountered opposition from the other representatives for her outspoken opposition to the 1991 Gulf War. She rejected George Bush Senior’s “7 Reasons for War” and was answered with a walkout by her “Right Honourable Friends”. She was witch-hunted out of the Georgia Legislature, but far from ending her political mission it encouraged her to stand for election to the US Congress under a human rights agenda. After being elected she joined the Armed Services Committee where she campaigned against the use of depleted uranium munitions and questioned President Bush on why there was no military response to the 9/11 attacks when they should have been able to easily locate and bring down the planes before they struck the buildings. Also, most famously of all, she grilled the then Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld over the war crimes of mercenaries employed by the government, the 9/11 stand-down and the suspected embezzlement of over 3 trillion $US from the US Defence budget. Not millions or even billions, but trillions. How can I describe it? Imagine a million pounds were just 1 penny. Now even on that scale a trillion pounds would still be £10,000. It's unimaginable! Here’s the very satisfying video of the exchange: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eootfzAhAoU . It didn’t take long for Cynthia to develop a reputation of sorts which drew the attention of that intangible and vague posse of mysterious individuals, political parties and organizations collectively known as the “Israel lobby”. (Here’s a Dispatches programme about the British arm of this group: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/series-42/episode-1) This attention ended in her being deselected by her party, the Democrats, while actually in office; this is the only time this has happened in American political history. So Cynthia restood for election as an independent candidate. Her manifesto is based on the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the same document that so inspired Nathan Sarea; see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/04/probe-conference-march-2009.html . Along with her humanitarian work abroad Cynthia got involved with a very scandalous case in Oakland, California. She showed us a film outlining it. It is all about an incident where a young black man called Oscar Grant was executed by the police while handcuffed and lying on the ground. Cynthia feels as strongly about the plight of her own people, the black Americans, as anyone else. She quotes King: “A threat to injustice anywhere is a threat to injustice everywhere” and that’s very true. As long as we sit back and think “It’s OK, it’s their problem and it doesn’t effect me”, the Elite can pick us off one at a time and play divide-and-rule on us so that we even support their agenda ourselves! Cynthia believes that we can liberate ourselves peacefully and she gives the current freedom movements in Latin America as an example, like Hugo Chavez and others, which is very encouraging. Although there may be situations when we have to fight back with force to stop ourselves being killed, (See: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/02/military-do-we-need-it.html) I agree with Cynthia. There are 6 billion of us and only 13 of them, at the highest level. If we play our cards right there’s no reason why it should come to violence. Cynthia talks like a politician and has obviously been trained as one, but unlike most politicians she retains the three bodily organs that most of them have amputated when they put on their suits and rosettes: a brain, a heart and a backbone. She was a very wise choice as a speaker for AV3 and I’m sure she inspired others as well as myself. During the weekend she contributed enormously to our spirit and morale.
Friday Evening Ctd
The layout at the Grand is different to the Thistle Heathrow. All the socializing took place in a single high-ceilinged chamber with chandeliers hanging from it called “The Ballroom”. The first act was Gareth Icke, (http://www.myspace.com/garethicke) a brilliant singer who came on stage and played unplugged and solo on his guitar. If the name sounds familiar it’s because he’s the son of Our Dave. He was followed by the satirical genius of Deek Jackson’s FKN NEWZ (http://main.fknnewz.com/blog/), this was his second live show; the first being at the AV2 Conference, see links above. Behind my hysterical laughter though I suddenly realized that I had a painful duty to perform. Deek mentioned spirituality in one of his shows so I’ve been forced to strip him of his MBA. So from now on he no longer has the right to call himself “Deek Jackson (MBA Bronze)”; he’s just plain old “Deek Jackson”. Sorry, Deek, but at least you were only a Bronze; others have further to fall… but seriously, he was funny! His humour is scathing, aggressive and offensive… and brilliant. It’s what this world needs!
(Go on to Part 2: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-2.html)
(Latest HPANWO Voice stories: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2009/11/ufo-disclosure-immient.html
And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2009/11/simon-mann-vs-mark-thatcher.html)